Search Results for "Meeting Rules, 1959"

452 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch and Upsarpanch in No-Confidence Motion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 17. Failure to Move Motion as Mandated Renders Subsequent Notice Invalid Under Section 35(3A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Ravindra Sukhdeo Sanap (Sarpanch) and Vishnu Eknath Nagare (Upsarpanch) of Gram Panchayat Andhera, challenged a notice dated 07.12.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Failure to Convene Monthly Meetings — Responsibility Lies with Village Development Officer Under Meeting Rules, Not Sarpanch Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

The petitioner, Salimbi Mubarak Tamboli, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Savargaon (Dere) in 2015, unopposed as the only OBC candidate. The U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Election of Returned Candidate in Gujarat Legislative Assembly Dispute Over Oath Translation. Use of 'Rajya Sabha' in Gujarati Oath to Translate 'Legislative Assembly' Held Not to Vitiate Oath, as Essential Requirements of Article 173 Were Met.

The dispute arose from the election to the Gujarat Legislative Assembly held in February 1967. The returned candidate, Nathalal Premji Bhanvadia, had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Divisional Commissioner's Order on Sarpanch Resignation. Court Considers Legality of Overturning Collector's Decision on Voluntariness of Resignation Under Section 29(3) of Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The writ petition was filed by three members of Grampanchayat Gondi (Ozre), challenging the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Pune, which allowed ...