Search Results for "Late Government Servant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "Late Government Servant"

407 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

15 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Deputy Collectors in Seniority Dispute Over Late Passing of Departmental Examination. The court held that seniority of direct recruits is determined by the order of merit in the selection list, not by the date of confirmation or passing of departmental examination, under Rule 12(1)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority among Deputy Collectors in Madhya Pradesh. The appellant, Warad Murti Mishra, was selected by the Madhya Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction on Eve of Retirement — Belated Claim Rejected as Service Record Entry Cannot Be Challenged After Decades. Service Law - Date of Birth Correction - Belated Claim - Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, Rule 14 - The petitioner sought correction of her date of birth from 07.04.1960 to 19.03.1961 just before retirement after 35 years of service. The court held that such belated claims cannot be entertained as they would unsettle settled matters and affect the service of others.

4 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Sau. Aruna Madhavrao Wankhede, was an Assistant Teacher and later Kendra Pramukh in Zilla Parishad schools. She joined service on 19.0...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Compassionate Appointment to Second Wife. Endorsement rejecting claim of second wife as not entitled to compassionate appointment under Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996 quashed.

5 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Smt. T.H. Ashalatha, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an endorsement dated 4....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused's Revision Petition in Prevention of Corruption Act Case — Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction Set Aside. Sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with by the Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act Must Be Obtained Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and the Special Judge erred in directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report and Disciplinary Proceedings Against BWSSB Engineer for Unauthorised Construction Allegation — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.

8 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Ramesh, an Assistant Executive Engineer with the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), filed a writ petition und...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Private Complaint Against MLA in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Renders Proceedings Invalid. The court held that sanction for prosecution is mandatory for public servants and failure to obtain it vitiates the complaint.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M. Srinivas, a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) of Karnataka, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proce...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)