Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction on Eve of Retirement — Belated Claim Rejected as Service Record Entry Cannot Be Challenged After Decades. Service Law - Date of Birth Correction - Belated Claim - Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, Rule 14 - The petitioner sought correction of her date of birth from 07.04.1960 to 19.03.1961 just before retirement after 35 years of service. The court held that such belated claims cannot be entertained as they would unsettle settled matters and affect the service of others.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 38
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sau. Aruna Madhavrao Wankhede, was an Assistant Teacher and later Kendra Pramukh in Zilla Parishad schools. She joined service on 19.01.1982 with her date of birth recorded as 07.04.1960 in her service record. In 2014, she obtained a school leaving certificate showing her date of birth as 19.03.1961. Just before her retirement on 31.04.2018, she made a representation on 27.02.2017 seeking correction of her date of birth. The Divisional Commissioner dismissed her appeal under Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The High Court upheld the dismissal, noting that the claim was highly belated and made on the eve of retirement, and that the service record entry had stood unchallenged for 35 years. The court held that allowing such correction would unsettle settled matters and affect the service of others. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Date of Birth Correction - Belated Claim - Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, Rule 14 - The petitioner sought correction of her date of birth from 07.04.1960 to 19.03.1961 just before retirement after 35 years of service. The court held that such belated claims cannot be entertained as they would unsettle settled matters and affect the service of others. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to correction of her date of birth in service record after 35 years of service and on the eve of retirement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Date of birth correction
  • belated claim
  • service record
  • superannuation
  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules
  • 1964
  • Rule 14
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (12) 104

WRIT PETITION NO. 15 OF 2019

2019-12-04

MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

Shri A. H. Mishra for petitioner; Ms. T. H. Khan, A.G.P. for respondent no.1

Sau. Aruna Madhavrao Wankhede

The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati; The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola; The Block Development Officer, Panchyat Samiti, Akola; The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Akola; The Block Education Officer, Panchyat Samiti, Akola

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order dismissing appeal for correction of date of birth in service record.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 21.08.2018 and correction of her date of birth from 07.04.1960 to 19.03.1961.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed her date of birth was wrongly recorded as 07.04.1960 instead of 19.03.1961 in service record and sought correction on the eve of retirement.

Previous Decisions

The Divisional Commissioner dismissed the petitioner's appeal under Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 on 21.08.2018.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to correction of her date of birth in service record after 35 years of service and on the eve of retirement.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her date of birth was wrongly recorded as 07.04.1960 instead of 19.03.1961 and sought correction based on school leaving certificate obtained in 2014. Respondents opposed the claim as highly belated and made just before retirement.

Ratio Decidendi

A claim for correction of date of birth in service record made after decades of service and on the eve of retirement is highly belated and cannot be entertained as it would unsettle settled matters and affect the service of others.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present petition, the Petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.08.2018 passed by the Respondent no. -1-Divisional Commissioner, Amravati in appeal proceedings under Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The Petitioner retired as Kendra Pramukh on 31.04.2018 on the basis of DoB recorded in her service record as 07.04.1960. The claim for correction of date of birth is highly belated and made on the eve of retirement. Hence, the petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The petitioner made a representation on 27.02.2017 to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola seeking correction of date of birth. The appeal before the Divisional Commissioner under Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 was dismissed on 21.08.2018. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964: Rule 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction on Eve of Retirement — Belated Claim Rejected as Service Record Entry Cannot Be Challenged After Decades. Service Law - Date of Birth Correction - Belated Claim - Maharashtra Zilla P...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalid Caste Scrutiny Order in Service Matter — Petitioner's Caste Claim as 'Thakur' (Scheduled Tribe) Upheld Based on Valid Documents and Affidavit of Relatives. The Court held that the Scrutiny ...