Search Results for "GST payment"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Reversal.

The petitioner, Niket Bipinbhai Patel, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a show-ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case on Assignment of Leasehold Rights - Assignment of Long-Term Leasehold Rights Held as Transfer of Immovable Property, Not Supply of Service Under Section 7 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Rendering GST Liability Inapplicable.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to the petitioner, a company that ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging VAT Investigation Post-GST. Section 78 of Maharashtra GST Savings Act Held Valid as It Continues VAT Act Only for One Year from Appointed Day as Permitted by Constitution Amendment.

The petitioner, Magma Fincorp Limited, a non-banking finance company registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (VAT Act), challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...