Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Reversal.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 164
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Niket Bipinbhai Patel, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a show-cause notice dated 28.10.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (A.E.) CGST-Central Excise, Vadodara-II Commissionerate, under Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The petitioner also sought a direction to unblock Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to Rs.98,11,678/-. The petitioner, a Non-Resident Indian residing in the USA, had acquired leasehold rights over a GIDC plot in Ankleshwar from Syngenta India Limited and was engaged in sub-plotting activities and transferring leasehold rights of such sub-plots to various purchasers. He obtained GST registration (GSTIN 24BGDPP4059A1ZR) w.e.f. 14.03.2022 solely for discharging GST liability on such transfers. For transferring leasehold rights, the petitioner was required to pay various charges to GIDC, including sub-divisional charges, NU penalty, miscellaneous administrative charges, transfer fees, and other statutory dues. The respondent issued the show-cause notice alleging that the petitioner's activity of transferring leasehold rights amounts to 'construction of immovable property' under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, thereby blocking ITC. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the show-cause notice was without jurisdiction and based on a misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d). The court held that the petitioner is not engaged in construction of immovable property but in transfer of existing leasehold rights, and thus the ITC cannot be blocked. The court quashed the show-cause notice and directed the respondent to unblock the ITC amount. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench comprising Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia and Honourable Mr. Justice Pranav Trivedi on 10.02.2026.

Headnote

A) Goods and Services Tax - Input Tax Credit - Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Transfer of Leasehold Rights - The petitioner, engaged in sub-plotting and transfer of leasehold rights of GIDC industrial plots, availed ITC on charges paid to GIDC. The respondent issued a show-cause notice under Section 74(1) alleging that such activity falls under 'construction of immovable property' and thus ITC is blocked under Section 17(5)(d). The court held that transfer of leasehold rights does not amount to construction of immovable property; the petitioner is not engaged in construction but in transfer of existing leasehold rights. The show-cause notice was quashed as without jurisdiction and based on misinterpretation of law. (Paras 1-9)

B) Goods and Services Tax - Show-Cause Notice - Jurisdiction - Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - The court found that the show-cause notice was issued without proper application of mind and misinterpreted the provisions of Section 17(5)(d). The respondent's action in blocking ITC and issuing the notice was held to be arbitrary and without jurisdiction. The court directed the respondent to unblock the ITC amounting to Rs.98,11,678/-. (Paras 3-9)

C) Goods and Services Tax - Natural Justice - Writ Petition - The court, after hearing the parties and considering the submissions, quashed the show-cause notice and directed unblocking of ITC, observing that the notice was based on a fundamental error of law and that no purpose would be served by allowing the respondent to proceed further. (Paras 5-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the show-cause notice dated 28.10.2025 issued under Section 74(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, seeking to reverse Input Tax Credit on the ground that the petitioner's activity of transferring leasehold rights of sub-plots amounts to 'construction of immovable property' under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, is legally sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the show-cause notice dated 28.10.2025 and directed the respondent to unblock the Input Tax Credit amounting to Rs.98,11,678/-.

Law Points

  • Input Tax Credit
  • Blocking of ITC
  • Show-cause notice jurisdiction
  • Section 17(5)(d) CGST Act
  • 2017
  • Transfer of leasehold rights
  • Construction of immovable property
  • Sub-plotting activities
  • GIDC charges
  • Natural justice
  • Writ petition maintainability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:12266-DB

R/Special Civil Application No. 18068 of 2025

2026-02-10

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia, Honourable Mr. Justice Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:12266-DB

Mr. Hardik V Vora for the Petitioner, Mr. Deepak N Khanchandani for the Respondent

Niket Bipinbhai Patel through Power of Attorney Holder Bipinbhai Madhavbhai Patel

Assistant Commissioner (A.E.) CGST-Central Excise Vadodara-II Commissionerate

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging show-cause notice under Section 74(1) of CGST Act and seeking unblocking of Input Tax Credit.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of show-cause notice dated 28.10.2025 and direction to unblock ITC of Rs.98,11,678/-.

Filing Reason

Respondent issued show-cause notice alleging that petitioner's activity of transferring leasehold rights amounts to 'construction of immovable property' under Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, thereby blocking ITC.

Issues

Whether the show-cause notice under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017, is without jurisdiction due to misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d)? Whether the petitioner's activity of transferring leasehold rights of sub-plots constitutes 'construction of immovable property' so as to block Input Tax Credit?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the show-cause notice is without jurisdiction and the respondent misinterpreted Section 17(5)(d) of the GST Act. Respondent's counsel requested time to take instructions and did not advance substantive arguments.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of leasehold rights of industrial plots does not amount to 'construction of immovable property' under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, Input Tax Credit on charges paid to GIDC for such transfer cannot be blocked. The show-cause notice issued under Section 74(1) was based on a misinterpretation of law and was without jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

It is noticed by us that the respondent has issued show cause notice under Section 74(1) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 dated 28.10.2025 is without jurisdiction and in fact the respondent authority has misinterpreted the provisions of Sections 17(5) (d) of the GST Act. By this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the show-cause notice dated 28.10.2025 under Section 74(1) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date. On 06.02.2026, the court passed an order noting that the show-cause notice appeared without jurisdiction and granted time to the respondent to take instructions. The matter was listed on 10.02.2026, when the final judgment was delivered.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 17(5)(d), Section 74(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Railway Protection Force Disciplinary Case, Upholding High Court's Setting Aside of Dismissal Order Without Inquiry. Dismissal Under Rule 161 of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Held Invalid Due to Failure to Re...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Rev...