Search Results for "slum areas act"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 427 OF 2009

The case concerns eviction proceedings initiated by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against the occupant, Niloufer Marshall, in respect ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization for Construction on Land Reserved for Garden Under MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Mohammed Ibrahim Abdul Khalique, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of a structure on a plo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Encroachment Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact and Admissibility of Maps. Maps Exhibited Without Objection During Trial Held Admissible, and Suit Not Barred Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act When Disputed Property Is Not Notified.

The respondent, a co-operative housing society, filed a suit against the appellants, claiming ownership of land admeasuring 11613 sq. mtrs. in Survey ...