Search Results for "secured creditor"

595 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 595 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Suspended Director Against Admission of Insolvency Petition by Canara Bank Under Section 7 of IBC. Held that a suspended director has no locus standi to challenge the admission of a Section 7 application as the corporate debtor is the proper party.

The case involves an appeal by M. Suresh Kumar Reddy, claiming to be a suspended director of M/s Kranthi Edifice Pvt. Ltd. (corporate debtor), against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Waiver of Pre-Deposit and Setting Aside of DRT Order Under SARFAESI Act; Auction Purchaser Disputes Complete Waiver Under Section 18 and Reversal of DRT's Dismissal of Securitisation Application.

The writ petition was filed by an auction purchaser under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging two orders of the Debt Recovery Appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs Magistrate to Expeditiously Dispose Section 14 SARFAESI Application for Possession of Secured Asset. Financial Institution's Right to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Upheld; Magistrate Directed to Pass Orders Within Two Weeks.

The petitioner, L & T Housing Finance Ltd., a financial institution registered under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, and as a Securitization and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Pre-Deposit Order Under SARFAESI Act. Pre-deposit of 30% of Amount Due Under Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act is Mandatory and DRAT Has No Discretion to Waive It.

The petitioner, Shree Vindhya Paper Mills Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 4 November 2011, which requir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Seeking Priority Over Sales Tax Dues. Sales Tax Department's First Charge Under Section 38C of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Prevails Over Secured Creditor's Rights Under Securitisation Act, 2002.

The Thane Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. (the Bank) filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Sales Tax Department in attaching the property of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order Allowing Workmen's Application for Payment of Gratuity and Other Dues from Company Assets. Workmen's dues have priority under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956, and Official Liquidator must pay from sale proceeds.

The case involves two appeals filed by Grand View Estates Private Limited and Forbes & Company Limited against an order of the Company Court allowing ...