Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India under Section 3 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). It is an assignee of a debt payable by respondent No.3, M/s. Crystal Mirage Pvt. Ltd., which is under liquidation. The debt was originally owed to Bank of India, which had initiated proceedings under the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (RDBA), registered as O.A. No. 54/2014. The petitioner was substituted as the applicant after the debt was assigned. The petitioner sought to preserve its right to proceed against a secured asset, namely Flat No. B-2202, 22nd floor, ad-measuring 4072 sq.ft., situated at Mahindra Eminente CHS Ltd., S.V. Road, Goregaon (West), Mumbai, which was mortgaged by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to secure the dues of respondent No.3. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to initiate or continue proceedings under the SARFAESI Act against the secured asset. The court considered whether the assignee of a debt can proceed under the SARFAESI Act when the borrower is under liquidation and RDBA proceedings are pending. The court held that the assignee steps into the shoes of the original lender and is entitled to all rights and remedies available to the lender, including the right to take recourse under the SARFAESI Act. The pendency of liquidation proceedings or RDBA proceedings does not bar the assignee from enforcing its security interest under the SARFAESI Act. The court allowed the petition, permitting the petitioner to proceed against the secured asset in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Assignment of Debt - Right to Proceed Against Secured Asset - The petitioner, an assignee of debt, sought to preserve its right to proceed against a flat mortgaged to secure dues of a company under liquidation. The court held that the assignee steps into the shoes of the original lender and is entitled to take recourse under SARFAESI Act, 2002, notwithstanding the pendency of liquidation proceedings and proceedings under the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an assignee of debt can initiate or continue proceedings under the SARFAESI Act against a secured asset when the borrower company is under liquidation and proceedings under the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 are pending.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to proceed against the secured asset in accordance with law under the SARFAESI Act.

Law Points

  • Assignee of debt steps into shoes of original lender
  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
  • 2002 (SARFAESI) proceedings can be initiated against secured asset even if company is under liquidation
  • Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act
  • 1993 proceedings pending
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-OS:23201-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 1039 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 323 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 342 OF 2017 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 80 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1039 OF 2017

2019-12-13

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J., SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

2019:BHC-OS:23201-DB

Mr. Rohit Gupta a/w Ms. Vinita Hambalkar a/w Ms. Sushila Vichare i/b Arbit Law Services for Petitioner, Mr. Vinay Sonpal Special Counsel a/w Ms. Jyoti Chavan AGP for State

ASREC (India) Limited

The State of Maharashtra, The Office of the Sales Tax Officer (C-110), Nodal Division, The Official Liquidator of the High Court of Bombay as the Official Liquidator of M/s. Crystal Mirage Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking to preserve right to proceed against secured asset under SARFAESI Act despite company being under liquidation and pending RDBA proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to initiate or continue proceedings under SARFAESI Act against the mortgaged property.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, as assignee of debt, wanted to enforce security interest against a flat mortgaged to secure dues of a company under liquidation.

Previous Decisions

Bank of India had initiated proceedings under RDBA (O.A. No. 54/2014), and petitioner was substituted as applicant after debt assignment.

Issues

Whether an assignee of debt can proceed under SARFAESI Act when the borrower company is under liquidation? Whether pendency of RDBA proceedings bars SARFAESI action?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that as assignee, it steps into the shoes of the original lender and is entitled to enforce security interest under SARFAESI Act. Respondents likely argued that liquidation and pending RDBA proceedings preclude SARFAESI action.

Ratio Decidendi

An assignee of debt steps into the shoes of the original lender and is entitled to all rights and remedies, including the right to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, notwithstanding the pendency of liquidation proceedings or proceedings under the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is an assignee of the debt payable by respondent No.3 which is under liquidation. It seeks to preserve its right to proceed against the secured asset by taking recourse to SARFAESI 2002. Flat No. B-2202... was mortgaged by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to secure the dues payable by respondent No.3 to the predecessor in interest of the petitioner who was the assignee of the debt as per Memorandum of Equitable Mortgage created on 11th November 2011.

Procedural History

Bank of India initiated proceedings under RDBA (O.A. No. 54/2014). Debt was assigned to petitioner, who was substituted as applicant. Petitioner filed writ petition to preserve right to proceed under SARFAESI Act. The court reserved judgment on December 12, 2019 and pronounced on December 13, 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: Section 3
  • Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows State's Revision and Restores Confiscation of Kerosene Under Essential Commodities Act. Appellate Court Cannot Substitute Its Own Satisfaction for That of Confiscating Authority Under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities ...