Search Results for "concurrent orders reversed"

284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Deceptive Similarity of Trade Marks 'Sri Andal' and 'Sri Ambal' in Snuff Dispute. Phonetic Affinity Between Mark Names Renders Consumer Confusion Likely Under Section 12(1) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The dispute arose when K.R. Chinna Krishna Chettiar, sole proprietor of Radha & Co., applied for registration of a trade mark for snuff consisting of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995.

The applicant, Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application by Tenants in Eviction Suit Under Bombay Rent Act — Maintainability of Suit by Unregistered Society Upheld. Concurrent Findings on Bona Fide Requirement Under Section 13(1)(g) Not Interfered With as No Perversity Shown.

The present civil revision application arose from an eviction suit filed by respondent No.1, Parit Samaj Seva Mandal, an unregistered society, through...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession.

The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a sui...