Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 30th June 2016 passed by the District Judge-1, Nashik, in Civil Appeal No. 131 of 2015. The District Judge had dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nashik, dated 30th April 2015, which rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC on the ground that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995. The applicant had filed a suit for declaration and injunction in respect of a property that was claimed to be a waqf property by the respondents. The respondents had already obtained an order from the Waqf Tribunal declaring the property as waqf property. The applicant contended that the property was not a waqf property and that the Civil Court had jurisdiction. The respondents argued that the suit was barred by Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995, which ousts the jurisdiction of Civil Courts in matters relating to waqf property. The High Court, after considering the submissions and the provisions of the Act, held that the Civil Court's jurisdiction is barred when the property is notified as waqf property and the Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. The court found that the concurrent findings of the courts below were correct and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error or perversity. Accordingly, the revision application was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Waqf Law - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Bar under Section 85 of Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995 - The suit property was claimed to be a waqf property by the respondents and the Waqf Tribunal had already passed an order declaring it as waqf property. The Civil Court held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995. The High Court upheld the concurrent findings and dismissed the revision, holding that the Civil Court's jurisdiction is barred when the property is notified as waqf property and the Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. (Paras 1-26)

B) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 115 - Revision - Scope - The revisional court under Section 115 CPC cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless there is a jurisdictional error or perversity. The High Court found no such error and dismissed the revision. (Paras 24-26)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit in respect of property which is claimed to be a waqf property, in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application, upholding the concurrent findings of the courts below that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Civil Court barred under Section 85 of Maharashtra Waqf Act
  • 1995
  • Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction
  • Concurrent findings of fact not interfered with in revision
  • Suit for declaration and injunction in respect of waqf property not maintainable in Civil Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (04) 59

Civil Revision Application No.429 of 2016

0000-00-00

Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd.

Dudadhari @ Kathada @ Kagzipura Masjid Trust, Nashik & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Application challenging the order rejecting plaint on ground of lack of jurisdiction of Civil Court in respect of waqf property.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought to set aside the order of the District Judge and the Civil Judge and to restore the suit for trial on merits.

Filing Reason

The applicant filed a suit for declaration and injunction in respect of property claimed to be waqf property; the plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC as the Civil Court lacked jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The Civil Judge Senior Division, Nashik, rejected the plaint on 30th April 2015. The District Judge-1, Nashik, dismissed the appeal on 30th June 2016.

Issues

Whether the Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit in respect of property which is claimed to be a waqf property, in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the property is not a waqf property and the Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide the issue. The respondents contended that the suit is barred by Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995, as the property is notified as waqf property and the Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The Civil Court's jurisdiction is barred under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995, when the property is notified as waqf property and the Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to decide matters relating to waqf property. The revisional court under Section 115 CPC cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless there is a jurisdictional error or perversity.

Judgment Excerpts

The Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995. The concurrent findings of the courts below are correct and do not suffer from any jurisdictional error or perversity.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a suit for declaration and injunction in the Civil Court. The Civil Judge Senior Division, Nashik, rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC on 30th April 2015. The applicant appealed to the District Judge-1, Nashik, who dismissed the appeal on 30th June 2016. The applicant then filed the present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995: Section 85
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 115, Order VII Rule 11(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf A...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired Land. Appellants failed to prove entitlement to enhanced market value of Rs.2500 per sq. metre under Section 18 of the Land Acquisit...