Search Results for "arbitration appointment"

1360 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1360 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in agreement conferred jurisdiction on Hyderabad courts, not Bombay High Court.

The petitioner, Aniket SA Investments LLC, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...