Search Results for "Small Family Declaration"

661 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 661 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.

The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Catering Policy 2005 for Railway Minor Units. Petitioners Seek to Quash Policy and Extend Existing Licences Under Catering Policy 2000.

The petitions involved a challenge to the Catering Policy 2005 introduced by the Indian Railways for minor catering units at railway stations across v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Maintainability of Suit Against Gratuitous Licensee Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. Dispute Arises from Eviction Suit Filed Before Small Cause Court, Challenged for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Gratuitous Licence.

The dispute arose from a suit for eviction filed in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay under section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Upholding Eviction: Court Rules in Favor of Landlord Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Conclusive Evidence in Written Agreements Seals Eviction; Jurisdictional and Procedural Claims Dismissed"

The case involves the eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on Leave and License Agreements between t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Refusing Return of Plaint in Suit for Possession of Garage. Court Holds That Question of Valuation and Court Fee Is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact to Be Decided at Trial, Not Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Ganpat Govind Shigvan, was a defendant in Suit No. 2151 of 2010 filed by the respondent, Preeti Paresh Shah, and her mother for posses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeal in Death Sentence Matter — Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence Discussed.

The matter involved confirmation of death sentence under Section 368 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and a criminal appeal against conviction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Councillor Under Section 10(1D) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. Alleged Illegal Construction by Councillor's Wife Was the Basis for Disqualification Under MRTP Act and MMC Act.

The petitioner, Avinash Ramesh Bagwe, was elected as a Councillor of the Pune Municipal Corporation on 23 February 2017 from a reserved Scheduled Cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...