Bombay High Court Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeal in Death Sentence Matter — Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence Discussed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter involved confirmation of death sentence under Section 368 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and a criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant, Nisar Ramzan Sayyed, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur on 22 September 2011 for the murder of his wife Summayya by burning her. The prosecution case was that Summayya was subjected to cruelty by the appellant and his family members due to a dowry demand of Rs. 50,000 for purchasing an auto-rickshaw. On 29 October 2010, at about 5 am, the appellant poured kerosene on Summayya and set her on fire with a matchstick. He also threw the couple's three-year-old son on her burning body. Summayya suffered 90% burns and was admitted to Mission Hospital, Wadala. She gave dying declarations to relatives (PW1 and PW2) and to police officers (Exhibits 61 and 67), consistently naming her husband as the perpetrator. She also stated that the appellant's family members (acquitted co-accused) were standing at the door at the time. Summayya died on 3 November 2010 due to neurogenic shock from the burns; a seven-month fetus also died. The investigation revealed kerosene stains and burnt articles at the scene. The appellant and co-accused were charged under Sections 302 and 498-A read with 34 IPC. The trial court acquitted the co-accused but convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to death. The State sought confirmation of the death sentence, and the appellant filed an appeal challenging the conviction. Before the High Court, the prosecution relied on the dying declarations and circumstantial evidence, while the appellant's defence was that Summayya committed suicide and the appellant had taken her to hospital; he also claimed to have previously complained to police about her suicidal threats. The court heard arguments and reserved judgment on 9 March 2012, and the judgment was pronounced on 19 March 2012. The provided extract of the judgment ends after the narration of prosecution witness evidence, and thus the final decision of the High Court is not contained in the available text.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the death sentence awarded to the accused Nisar Ramzan Sayyed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is liable to be confirmed in view of Section 368 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and whether the conviction is sustainable on merits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (03) 21

Confirmation Case No.1 of 2011 With Criminal Appeal No.584 of 2011

2012-03-19

Naresh H Patil, T.V. Nalawade

V.D. Sapkal, Kailas B Autade, S.D. Kaldate

Nisar Ramzan Sayyed

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Confirmation of death sentence by the State under Section 368 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and criminal appeal by the convict against conviction and sentence.

Remedy Sought

State sought confirmation of death sentence; appellant sought acquittal.

Filing Reason

The trial court sentenced the accused to death, necessitating confirmation by the High Court; the accused appealed against the conviction.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur convicted the accused under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to death on 22 September 2011; co-accused were acquitted.

Issues

Whether the death sentence is liable to be confirmed Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable on the evidence

Judgment Excerpts

husband has burnt her neorogenic shock due to 90% burns

Procedural History

The Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to death on 22 September 2011, acquitting co-accused. The State filed Confirmation Case No.1 of 2011. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.584 of 2011. The High Court reserved judgment on 9 March 2012 and pronounced it on 19 March 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498-A, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 368, 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Discharge Application in Criminal Complaint for Alleged False Claim of Family Planning Reward - Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Absence of Prima Facie Case for Offences Under Sections 420, 465, 177, 1...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeal in Death Sentence Matter — Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence Discussed.