Search Results for "Section 16(2) notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Section 16(2) notification"

432 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 432 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Election Petition Challenging Election of Returned Candidate from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency on Grounds of Non-disclosure of Assets. Petition Filed Under Sections 80, 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Alleges Suppression of Material Information in Nomination Affidavit.

16 Feb 2026

The election petition was filed by Sri. C. Muniraju, an unsuccessful candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, challenging the election of Sri. S.N. Su...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Municipal Councillors and Appointment of Administrator. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 41 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 in Removal Orders.

10 Feb 2026

The matter comprised two writ petitions. W.P. No. 101601/2025 was filed by elected councillors of Gadag-Betageri City Municipal Council challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Trial Court's Finding of Civil Court Jurisdiction in Land Acquisition Dispute. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Injunction Despite Bar Under Section 22 of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons and Rehabilitation Act, 1986, as the Suit Challenges Unauthorized Possession, Not Acquisition Proceedings.

22 Dec 2022

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the State of Maharashtra and others (original defendants) challenging the order dated 18.02.1998 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Appellant Claimant Awarded Enhanced Compensation for Agricultural Land and Fruit Bearing Trees. Court Held That Reference Court Erred in Not Considering Potentiality of Land and Separate Value of Trees, Enhancing Market Value and Tree Compensation.

25 Feb 2020

The appellant, Kasturabai Karpe, owned agricultural lands Gut Nos. 162 and 166 at village Leha, Taluka Phulambri, District Aurangabad, which were acqu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge Order Quashing Acquisition for Lapse of Time and Non-Compliance with Section 11A of LARR Act. The court held that failure to pass award within two years from Section 6 declaration renders acquisition void, and alternative remedy under Section 18 is not a bar when acquisition is invalid.

3 Jan 2020

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) against a common order of a learned Single Judge dated 16.06.201...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.

16 Aug 2019

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...

High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

16 Aug 2019

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

18 Dec 2015

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Challenge to Exemption Notifications Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Comparison of Benefits Must Be Holistic, Not Item-by-Item, to Determine if Exemption Is Justified.

10 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi, a registered trade union representing private security guards, filed a writ petition challenging ...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)