Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961"

414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Notifications Issued in 2005 Filed in 2019 Held Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Sri B R Srinivas, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010306832010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.

The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Government's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Temporary Employees in Government Hospitals. Back Door Entry Without Selection Process Disqualifies Claim for Regularisation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The State Government filed eight petitions challenging a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Satara, which had directed continuation of services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications Due to Delay Condonation and Enhanced Compensation Claims. The court held that delay in filing reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 should be condoned and matters remitted for fresh adjudication.

The judgment involves multiple civil revision applications filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for public purposes under the Land Acquisitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...