Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal construction on land abutting the sea coast in violation of the Coastal Zone Regulations (CRZ) of 1991, the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act), and the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The petitioners alleged that the fourth to seventh respondents had commenced huge illegal construction on Gat No.334 (Old Survey No.100) of village Kolegaon, District Raigad, without obtaining necessary permissions. The court noted that the first petitioner was a recognized environmental group and the second petitioner was an activist. The petition highlighted that the construction, a bungalow exceeding 4000 square feet, was in flagrant violation of law and endangered the fragile coastal ecosystem. The court, after hearing submissions, found that the construction was illegal and directed the respondents to demolish the same within eight weeks from the date of the judgment. The court also directed the state authorities to ensure compliance and report back. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to environmental regulations and town planning laws to protect the coastal environment.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Coastal Zone Regulations - Illegal Construction - CRZ Notification 1991 - The petitioners alleged that the respondents constructed a bungalow exceeding 4000 sq. ft. on land abutting the sea coast without obtaining permission from the Planning Authority under the MRTP Act or the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, and in violation of CRZ Regulations. The court found that the construction was illegal and directed the respondents to demolish the same within eight weeks. (Paras 1-20)

B) Public Interest Litigation - Locus Standi - Environmental Protection - The first petitioner, a registered society with the object of environmental protection, was recognized as a responsible public interest group. The court entertained the petition as a Public Interest Litigation. (Paras 2-3)

C) Town Planning - Unauthorized Construction - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The court held that the construction was carried out without obtaining permission from the Planning Authority, and thus was illegal. The court directed the demolition of the unauthorized structure. (Paras 1-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the construction carried out by the respondents on the said land is illegal and in violation of the CRZ Regulations, MRTP Act, and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, and whether the court should order its demolition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to demolish the illegal construction within eight weeks from the date of the judgment. The state authorities were directed to ensure compliance and report back.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Coastal Zone Regulations
  • Illegal Construction
  • Demolition Order
  • Environmental Protection
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (11) 31

WRIT PETITION NO.2692 OF 2000

2018-11-01

A.S. Oka, Riyaz I. Chagla

Mr. Navroz Seerwai, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Arif Doctor with Ms. Sheetal Shah and Ms. Meharunnis Tole I/by M/s. Mehta and Girdharlal for the Petitioners; Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3; Mr. Jayant Mehta a/w Ms. Dimple Merchant and Mr. Aamir Sheikh I/by I.V. Merchant and Co. for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7; Mrs. Sharmila U. Deshmukh for the Respondent No.8.

Bombay Environmental Action Group and Anr.

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation alleging illegal construction in violation of CRZ Regulations, MRTP Act, and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought court's intervention to stop illegal construction and order demolition.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal construction by respondents on land abutting sea coast without necessary permissions.

Issues

Whether the construction on the said land is illegal and in violation of CRZ Regulations, MRTP Act, and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Whether the court should order demolition of the illegal construction.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the construction was illegal, without permission, and violated CRZ Regulations. Respondents likely contested the allegations, but specific arguments not detailed in the provided text.

Ratio Decidendi

The construction was carried out without obtaining permission from the Planning Authority under the MRTP Act and the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, and in violation of CRZ Regulations, hence it is illegal and must be demolished.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have invited attention of the Court to the alleged illegal construction carried out by the fourth to seventh respondents. It is alleged that the construction has been carried out without obtaining permission of the Planning Authority under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 as well as from the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2000. Submissions were heard on 26.07.2018 and judgment pronounced on 01.11.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Coastal Zone Regulations, 1991:
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966:
  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Societies' Registration Act, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.