Search Results for "Service Contract"

4346 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4346 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Sets Aside Ex Parte Interim Injunction for Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Appellant-Defendant's Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Dismissed as Not Maintainable at Interim Stage.

The appellant, Hinduja Renewables Two Private Limited, was the defendant No.6 in OS No.225/2021 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Examine Genuineness of Compromise and Consent of Parties, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Based on Unverified WhatsApp Video as Abuse of Process. Court holds that a public interest litigation founded on a viral video without independent verification or credible material amounts to an abuse of the process of law and cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, Luhar Jayantibhai Jugabhai, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Gujarat High Court alleging illegal demolition of a building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Third Parties in Specific Performance Suit Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Co-owners and Signatories to Development Agreement and Partition Deed Held Necessary for Effectual Adjudication.

The petitioner, M/s. Divya Builders, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration and Execution Proceedings to Principal District Judge Nagpur by Consent. Parties Agree Not to Raise Objections Under Arbitration Act or Commercial Courts Ordinance, 2015.

The petitioner, M/s. Kandla Cargo Handlers, challenged an order dated 27.6.2018 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Nagpur, which granted ...