Search Results for "subsisting lease"

424 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 424 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Interim Application in Partition Suit Over Alleged HUF Properties. Plaintiff Seeks Injunction and Appointment of Court Receiver Pending Suit, Claiming Undivided Share Despite 2001 Affidavit Acknowledging Properties as Self-Acquired.

The present order arises from an Interim Application filed by the plaintiff, Variinder @ Rajan, in Suit No. 343 of 2022 before the High Court of Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Films 'Karz' and 'Hero' — Plaintiffs' Rights Under Agreement Dated 20.9.2002 Protected Against Defendants' Claim Under Earlier Agreements for 16mm Video Rights.

The plaintiffs, Shemaroo Video Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the defendants, Movie Tee Vee Enterprises and others, ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...