Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Films 'Karz' and 'Hero' — Plaintiffs' Rights Under Agreement Dated 20.9.2002 Protected Against Defendants' Claim Under Earlier Agreements for 16mm Video Rights.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 44
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiffs, Shemaroo Video Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the defendants, Movie Tee Vee Enterprises and others, had no right, title, or license to exploit or exhibit the films 'Karz' and 'Hero' in CD and DVD formats. The plaintiffs also sought a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing their copyright under an agreement dated 20.9.2002. The plaintiffs claimed that plaintiff no.2 was the producer of the films and had entered into an agreement with plaintiff no.1 granting exclusive rights for video exploitation. The defendants, however, claimed rights under earlier agreements dated 4.5.1983 and 1.5.1985, which granted them exclusive rights for 99 years for distribution and exploitation in '16mm video and reduced sizes'. The court considered whether the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie case for interim injunction. The court noted that the earlier agreements did not specifically cover CD and DVD formats, which were not in existence at that time. The court held that the plaintiffs had a strong prima facie case, the balance of convenience was in their favor, and irreparable loss would be caused if the injunction was not granted. Accordingly, the court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from exploiting the films in CD and DVD formats until the disposal of the suit.

Headnote

A) Copyright Law - Assignment of Copyright - Prima Facie Case - Section 14, 51, 55 Copyright Act, 1957 - The plaintiffs claimed exclusive rights over films 'Karz' and 'Hero' under an agreement dated 20.9.2002, while defendants claimed rights under earlier agreements of 1983 and 1985 for 99 years. The court held that the plaintiffs had made out a strong prima facie case for grant of injunction as the earlier agreements did not cover CD/DVD rights, which were new formats not contemplated at the time. (Paras 1-3)

B) Interim Injunction - Balance of Convenience - Irreparable Loss - The court found that the balance of convenience was in favor of the plaintiffs as the defendants had not exploited the films for a long period and the plaintiffs had invested in acquiring the rights. Irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiffs if injunction was not granted. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction restraining the defendants from exploiting the films 'Karz' and 'Hero' in CD and DVD formats based on the agreement dated 20.9.2002.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Interim injunction granted restraining the defendants from exploiting the films 'Karz' and 'Hero' in CD and DVD formats until disposal of the suit.

Law Points

  • Copyright Act
  • 1957
  • Section 14
  • Section 51
  • Section 55
  • Assignment of Copyright
  • Exclusive License
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Balance of Convenience
  • Irreparable Loss
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (10) 54

Notice of Motion No. 2100 of 2005 in Suit No. 1902 of 2005

2005-10-06

S.U. Kamdar, J.

V. Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel with Soumya Srikrishna i/b. Anil Menon for the plaintiffs; Mr. B. Saraf with Kanta Shah i/b. A.G. Shah for the defendants

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding copyright in films 'Karz' and 'Hero'.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought declaration that defendants have no right to exploit the films in CD/DVD formats and permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright.

Filing Reason

Defendants claimed rights under earlier agreements of 1983 and 1985 for 99 years, which plaintiffs disputed as not covering CD/DVD formats.

Issues

Whether the plaintiffs have a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction. Whether the balance of convenience lies in favor of the plaintiffs. Whether irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiffs if injunction is not granted.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiffs argued that they acquired exclusive rights under agreement dated 20.9.2002 and defendants' earlier agreements did not cover CD/DVD formats. Defendants argued that they had exclusive rights for 99 years under agreements of 1983 and 1985 for all video formats.

Ratio Decidendi

The earlier agreements of 1983 and 1985 granting rights in '16mm video and reduced sizes' do not cover CD and DVD formats, which were not in existence at that time. Therefore, the plaintiffs' rights under the later agreement of 20.9.2002 are prima facie valid, and the balance of convenience favors granting interim injunction to prevent irreparable loss.

Judgment Excerpts

The present notice of motion is taken out in the suit preferred by the plaintiff for a declaration that the defendant has no right, title and interest nor any licence to exploit or exhibit in any manner films known as 'Karz' and 'Hero'. In nutshell the facts of the present case are briefly enumerated as under :

Procedural History

The plaintiffs filed Suit No. 1902 of 2005 seeking declaration and permanent injunction. Along with the suit, they took out Notice of Motion No. 2100 of 2005 for interim injunction. The court heard the motion and passed the order on 6th October 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Copyright Act, 1957: 14, 51, 55
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Lease Rights of Deceased Lessee's Legal Heir in Municipal Property Dispute. City Municipal Council's Notice of Termination Quashed for Violating Principles of Natural Justice and Failing to Provide Opportunity of Heari...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Films 'Karz' and 'Hero' — Plaintiffs' Rights Under Agreement Dated 20.9.2002 Protected Against Defendants' Claim Under Earlier Agreements for 16mm Video Rights.