Search Results for "bogus contract"

179 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 179 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Restrains Creation of Third Party Rights but Refuses Possession Relief. Interim Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Granted Only to Protect Property from Alienation, Not to Disturb Existing Possession.

The appellant, Bapurao Khante, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 15/05/2000 executed by the respondent, Bhagwan Khan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking FIR Registration in Investment Dispute — Civil Nature of Complaint Upheld. Court held that the dispute involving alleged misappropriation of funds by company directors was primarily civil in nature, and the police's closure of enquiry was justified.

The petitioner, M/s. Fairwinds Asset Managers Ltd., acting as fund manager for Reliance Alternative Investments Fund – Private Equity Scheme I (RAIF...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was maintainable and that the plaintiffs had established their share in the joint family property.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants) seeking partition and separate possession...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Debt Recovery Suit — Defendant's Evasive Denial and Limitation Plea Rejected Based on Confirmation of Accounts and Part Payments.

The plaintiff, Ajay Aggarwal, carrying on business as M/s. Royal Elastics, filed a summary suit against the defendant, Mohit Aneja, proprietor of M/s....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Tender Process in Construction Contract Dispute. Court held that the tender condition was clear and the petitioner's misinterpretation did not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Arcons Infrastructures & Constructions (P) Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...