Search Results for "Tahasildar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Tahasildar"

577 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 577 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Procedural Violations. Motion Not Moved or Seconded and No Debate Held Before Voting, Rendering Resolution Void Under Rules 17 and 21-28 of Bombay Village Panchayat Meeting Rules, 1959.

6 May 2010

The case arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Pali, Raigad district, under the Bombay Village Panchayat Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Gram Panchayat Election Due to Non-Validation of Caste Certificate by Scrutiny Committee. Court Directs Scrutiny Committee to Validate Certificate Within Four Weeks and Permits Petitioner to Contest Election Pending Validation.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Shankarrao Shetewad, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination paper for the post of member of Gra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. The Court held that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 excludes the date of receipt of the notice, validating the special meeting held on the seventh day.

5 Nov 2014

The case pertains to a no-confidence motion moved against the Sarpanch of Belgaon-Kelgaon Gram Panchayat. The petitioners, six out of nine members, su...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to prove title and possession; courts below rightly dismissed suit for declaration and injunction.

28 Jan 2019

The appellant, Sri G.K. Shekharappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition to Recall Earlier Order Permitting Construction of Bridge Alleging Fraud and Non-Disclosure of Material Facts. Petitioners Allege Respondent Concealed Destruction of Mangroves, Dumping of Hazardous Waste, and Pending NGT Proceedings.

23 Feb 2024

The petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, by Samita Rajendra Patil and S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Rent Dispute. The Court held that under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, the Tribunal cannot remand unless evidence is insufficient or opportunity to lead evidence was denied.

25 Nov 2011

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a suit for recovery of rent (RCS No. 97 of 1978), challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MR...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Mutation Entry Orders in Land Dispute — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Mutation entries made without notice to petitioners set aside under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

23 Apr 2015

The petitioners, Damodar Vittal Kamath and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entry Based on Will in Land Revenue Case — Civil Court Decree Binding on Revenue Authorities. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Amrutrao Shankarrao Deshmukh and Dhananjay Amrutrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Declaration Suit — Minor Defendants' Rights Not Properly Represented; Remands for Fresh Consideration. The trial court's decree for declaration and injunction was set aside due to failure to appoint guardian ad litem for minor defendants under Order 32 Rule 3 CPC.

10 Jul 2018

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeals in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upheld trial and first appellate court decisions that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that suit was barred by limitation.

18 Jun 2025

The judgment pertains to three Regular Second Appeals (RSA No. 2256/2006, RSA No. 2257/2006, and RSA No. 2258/2006) filed by the legal representatives...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)