Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. The Court held that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 excludes the date of receipt of the notice, validating the special meeting held on the seventh day.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 86
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to a no-confidence motion moved against the Sarpanch of Belgaon-Kelgaon Gram Panchayat. The petitioners, six out of nine members, submitted a notice of no-confidence on 29-03-2014 to the Tahsildar. On the same day, the Tahsildar issued a notice convening a special meeting on 05-04-2014. The motion was passed with six votes in favor and none against, with three members absent including the Sarpanch. The Sarpanch appealed to the Additional Collector, who set aside the meeting as illegal, holding that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 should be calculated by including the date of receipt, making the meeting held on the seventh day invalid. The petitioners challenged this order before the High Court. The legal issue was whether the seven-day period for convening the special meeting should be calculated by excluding the date of receipt of the notice. The petitioners argued that the date of receipt should be excluded, relying on the principle that in computing time, the first day is excluded. The respondents contended that the meeting was held on the seventh day including the date of receipt, thus violating the requirement of seven clear days. The High Court analyzed Section 35(2) and applied the general principle of computation of time, holding that the date of receipt must be excluded. The Court noted that the notice was received on 29-03-2014, and the meeting was held on 05-04-2014, which is the seventh day after excluding 29-03-2014. Therefore, the meeting was valid. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order of the Additional Collector, and upheld the no-confidence motion.

Headnote

A) Interpretation of Statutes - Calculation of Time - Exclusion of First Day - Section 35(2) Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 - The issue was whether the seven-day period for convening a special meeting under Section 35(2) should include or exclude the date of receipt of the notice. The Court held that the date of receipt of the notice must be excluded, and the meeting can be held on the seventh day after such receipt. The Court relied on the principle that in computing time, the first day is excluded and the last day is included, unless the statute provides otherwise. (Paras 2-8)

B) Local Self-Government - No-Confidence Motion - Validity of Meeting - Section 35(2) Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 - The petitioners moved a no-confidence motion against the Sarpanch on 29-03-2014, and the Tahsildar issued notice for a special meeting on 05-04-2014. The Additional Collector set aside the meeting as illegal, holding that the meeting was held on the seventh day including the date of receipt. The High Court reversed this, holding that the meeting was valid as the seven-day period excludes the date of receipt. (Paras 3-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 for convening a special meeting to consider a no-confidence motion should be calculated by excluding the date of receipt of the notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order of the Additional Collector dated 25-06-2014, and upheld the no-confidence motion passed against respondent No. 3.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Calculation of time
  • Exclusion of first day
  • Section 35(2) Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act
  • 1958
  • No-confidence motion
  • Special meeting
  • Seven days notice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (11) 15

Writ Petition No. 5694 of 2014

2014-11-05

Ravindra V. Ghuge

Mr. M.P. Tripathi holding for Mr. N.B. Khandare for petitioners, Mr. D.B. Bhange, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Mrs. Renuka Ghule for respondent No. 3

Sau. Pranita W/o Khanderao Chaure and others

The Additional Collector, Ambajogai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Collector setting aside a no-confidence motion against the Sarpanch.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the order of the Additional Collector and uphold the no-confidence motion.

Filing Reason

The Additional Collector held that the special meeting convened on 05-04-2014 was illegal as the seven-day period under Section 35(2) was not complied with.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Collector, Ambajogai, by judgment and order dated 25-06-2014, allowed the appeal of the Sarpanch and set aside the no-confidence motion.

Issues

Whether the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 for convening a special meeting should be calculated by excluding the date of receipt of the notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the date of receipt of the notice should be excluded, and the meeting held on the seventh day thereafter is valid. Respondents contended that the meeting was held on the seventh day including the date of receipt, thus violating the requirement of seven clear days.

Ratio Decidendi

In computing the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958, the date of receipt of the notice must be excluded. The meeting can be held on the seventh day after such receipt. This interpretation aligns with the general principle of computation of time that the first day is excluded and the last day is included.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue raised for the consideration of this Court is as regards the manner in which seven days are to be calculated under Section 35 (2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 in relation to passing of 'no confidence' motion. In the light of the above, I am of the view that the date of receipt of the notice is to be excluded and the meeting can be held on the seventh day after the receipt of the notice.

Procedural History

The petitioners moved a no-confidence motion on 29-03-2014. The Tahsildar issued notice for a special meeting on 05-04-2014. The motion was passed. The Sarpanch appealed to the Additional Collector, who set aside the motion on 25-06-2014. The petitioners filed the present writ petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958: 35(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. The Court held that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 excludes ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Death of Self-Employed Woman in Motor Accident — Future Prospects Considered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that the Tribunal erred in not considering future prospects an...