Search Results for "Section 135 Indian Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 135 Indian Contract Act"

384 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.

1 Aug 2026

The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...

High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

16 Aug 2019

...

High Court

KAHC010822332025_1

8 Jul 2026

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

30 Nov -0001

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)