Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export of jewellery from their units located in the Santacruz Electronic Export Processing Zone (SEEPZ) Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Mumbai. They filed writ petitions challenging the demand of customs duty by the customs authorities on the export of jewellery to foreign buyers. The petitioners argued that the goods manufactured in an SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under the Customs Act, 1962, as the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and provides for exemption from customs duty on exports. The respondents, including the Union of India and customs authorities, contended that the goods were not 'export' under the Customs Act and that duty was leviable. The court analyzed the definitions under the SEZ Act, 2005 and the Customs Act, 1962, and held that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a special statute that overrides the Customs Act. The court found that the goods were exported from the SEZ to foreign buyers and thus fell within the definition of 'export' under Section 2(m) of the SEZ Act, 2005. Consequently, the demand of customs duty was invalid. The court allowed the writ petitions and quashed the demand notices.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Special Economic Zone - Export of Goods - Section 2(23) Customs Act, 1962, Section 26 SEZ Act, 2005 - The issue was whether goods manufactured in an SEZ and exported are 'export' under the Customs Act, 1962, and whether customs duty is leviable. The court held that such goods are exported and not liable to customs duty as the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act. (Paras 1-10)

B) Customs Law - Special Economic Zone - Levy of Duty - Section 76 SEZ Act, 2005, Section 2(m) SEZ Act, 2005 - The court examined whether the demand of customs duty on goods exported from SEZ was valid. Held that the SEZ Act, 2005 provides for exemption from customs duty on goods exported from SEZ, and the demand was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act. (Paras 11-20)

C) Customs Law - Special Economic Zone - Interpretation of Statutes - Section 2(r) SEZ Act, 2005 - The court interpreted the definition of 'export' under the SEZ Act and Customs Act. Held that the definition under the SEZ Act is broader and includes goods taken out of SEZ to any place outside India, and no customs duty is payable. (Paras 21-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether goods manufactured in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and exported to foreign buyers are liable to payment of customs duty under the Customs Act, 1962, and whether the demand of duty by the customs authorities is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petitions allowed. Demand notices for customs duty quashed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Customs duty
  • Special Economic Zone
  • Export
  • Manufacture
  • Section 2(23) Customs Act
  • 1962
  • Section 26 SEZ Act
  • 2005
  • Section 76 SEZ Act
  • Section 2(m) SEZ Act
  • Section 2(r) SEZ Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 54

Writ Petition No. 2003 of 2009 and Writ Petition No. 2004 of 2009

2022-11-19

2022:BHC-OS:8435

M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India, Commissioner of Customs, Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Secretary Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Development Commissioner SEEPZ Special Economic Zone

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging demand of customs duty on export of jewellery from SEZ.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of demand notices for customs duty on exports.

Filing Reason

Customs authorities demanded duty on goods exported from SEZ, which petitioners claimed were exempt.

Issues

Whether goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are liable to customs duty under Customs Act, 1962. Whether the SEZ Act, 2005 overrides the Customs Act, 1962 in respect of exports from SEZ.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that SEZ Act is a complete code and exempts exports from customs duty. Respondents argued that goods were not 'export' under Customs Act and duty was leviable.

Ratio Decidendi

The Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, 1962 in respect of goods manufactured in an SEZ and exported. Such exports are not liable to customs duty.

Judgment Excerpts

The SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, 1962. Goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty.

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed in 2009 challenging demand notices. Heard and decided on 19 November 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 2(23)
  • Special Economic Zones Act, 2005: Section 2(m), Section 2(r), Section 26, Section 76
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Imported Container Without Payment of Full Rent and Demurrage for Re-export — Petitioner Not Liable for Charges After Customs Clearance Refusal Due to Misdeclaration