Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case: Commissioner's Decision on Nil Duty Binding on Assessing Officer. Duty on DTA Clearances of Fresh Mushrooms by 100% EOU Held Nil Following Commissioner's Order Under Section 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

14 Dec 2012

The appellant, ECO Valley Farms & Foods Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in cultivation, manufacture, and export of fresh/processed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Inputs Used in Exempted Goods, Partially Allows Revenue's Appeals on Education Cess. Tractors are exempted goods despite education cess, but separate accounts are required under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

4 Dec 2019

The judgment concerns multiple appeals filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Assessee) and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Revenue) against a co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Tribunal Cannot Reduce Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC. Assessee Not Entitled to Benefit of Provisos for Payment of Duty and Interest After Show Cause Notice.

13 Oct 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Personal Hearing Notice Due to Inordinate Delay in Adjudication — Customs Act, 1962 — Delay of 16 Years in Remand Proceedings Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Right to Speedy Adjudication

11 Nov 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, challenged a show cause notice dated 24.09.2003 and a personal hearing notic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Second Buyer of Imported Car, Sets Aside Duty Demand and Penalty. The Court held that once confiscation of a vehicle becomes final due to non-exercise of the redemption option, no customs duty can be demanded from a subsequent purchaser and no penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is sustainable.

30 Apr 2019

The appeal was filed by Gagandeep Singh Anand under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 28 July 2017 of the Customs, Exc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.

9 Sep 2014

The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

7 Oct 2014

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.

19 Jan 2015

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Directs Reconsideration of Declaration by Allowing Pre-deposit Adjustment. The Court held that rejection of declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on ground of non-reflection of pre-deposit in electronic ledger was unjustified and directed reconsideration.

28 Jan 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Code Engineers Private Limited, a company engaged in providing erection, commissioning and installation services, was registered ...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)