Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) confirming the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order that set aside the Deputy Commissioner's direction for recovery of interest under Section 11AB and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The respondent-assessee, M/s Ahmednagar Forging Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing motor vehicle parts. During July 2004 to March 2005, the assessee cleared excisable goods on payment of duty based on purchase order prices. Subsequently, the assessee claimed enhanced prices from customers due to increased costs, leading to a short payment of duty. The Deputy Commissioner ordered recovery of interest and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) and CESTAT set aside both interest and penalty. The Revenue appealed, raising the sole substantial question of law whether interest under Section 11AB could be waived. The High Court held that interest under Section 11AB is mandatory and cannot be waived, even if penalty is waived. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and CESTAT to the extent they waived interest, and restored the Deputy Commissioner's order regarding interest. The court did not disturb the waiver of penalty.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Interest - Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 - Mandatory Nature - The issue was whether interest under Section 11AB can be waived by appellate authorities. The court held that interest under Section 11AB is mandatory and cannot be waived, even if penalty under Section 11AC is waived or reduced. The Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal erred in setting aside the interest component. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the adjudicating authorities have acted in conformity with the provisions of law in waiving the interest imposed under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and CESTAT are set aside to the extent they waive interest under Section 11AB. The Deputy Commissioner's order regarding interest is restored. The waiver of penalty is not disturbed.

Law Points

  • Interest under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act is mandatory and cannot be waived
  • even if penalty is waived or reduced
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (02) 13

First Appeal No.1349 of 2008

2011-02-10

D.B. Bhosale, R.M. Borde

Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General, for the appellant. Respondent absent, though served.

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Town Centre, N5, CIDCO, Aurangabad

M/s Ahmednagar Forging Ltd., D95, M.I.D.C., Ahmednagar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue against order of CESTAT confirming waiver of interest under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought restoration of interest imposed under Section 11AB.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner (Appeals) and CESTAT set aside the Deputy Commissioner's order directing recovery of interest and penalty.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Commissioner ordered recovery of interest and penalty; Commissioner (Appeals) set aside both; CESTAT confirmed Commissioner (Appeals)'s order.

Issues

Whether interest under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act can be waived by appellate authorities?

Submissions/Arguments

Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General, argued that interest under Section 11AB is mandatory and cannot be waived.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is mandatory and cannot be waived by appellate authorities, even if penalty under Section 11AC is waived or reduced.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether in the facts of the matter, the adjudicating authorities have acted in conformity with the provisions of law in waiving the interest imposed under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944?

Procedural History

Deputy Commissioner ordered recovery of interest and penalty. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside both. CESTAT confirmed Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. Revenue appealed to High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 11AB, Section 11AC
  • Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985: Entry No. 73 of the Ist Schedule
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Remands for Reconsideration on Condition of 10% Pre-deposit. The court held that a person whose GST registration was cancelled and business discontinued cannot be expected to...