Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"

3422 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3422 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Heirs' Petition in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delay and Laches. False Statement Regarding Knowledge of Proceedings Leads to Dismissal Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petition was filed by the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased original tenant, Baban Vishnu Shivale, under Article 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to BDA Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Final Notification Under BDA Act, 1976.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various land owners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010124482018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Orders in Mundkarial Dispute. Key Issue Whether Mamlatdar Had Jurisdiction to Determine Mundkarial Rights When Reference Was Made Under Section 32 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

The litigation originated from two civil suits filed in 1992 by M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust against one Armando Cardozo for remov...