Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court Examines Challenge to Reservation Notifications for Urban Local Body Wards in Karnataka. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Impugned Notifications and Reversion to Draft Reservations.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-23 23:29:50
  • 103
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010488852018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 36

W.P. No.44499/2018 c/w other writ petitions

2019-01-14

Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Abishek Marla M.J., K.N.Phaneendra, Vaishali Hegde, Vishwajith Shetty, Dinesh Rao, Prathima Honnapura, S.Rajashekar, Ashok Haranahalli, Manmohan P.N., Rajaram Sooryambail, Dhananjay Kumar, Udaya Prakash Muliya, Rahul S. Reddy, Devi Prasad Shetty, S. Basavaraj, M. Ravindranath, Naveen J. N., Nagarajappa A., Mahesh R. Uppin

Mr. Ravindra Nayak and other petitioners

Karnataka State Election Commission and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reservation of wards in urban local body elections

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned notifications and direction to reserve wards as per draft notification or for general category

Filing Reason

Impugned notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 altering reservation of wards

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions filed challenging reservation notifications; clubbed together for hearing before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
local body election ward reservation notification challenge urban local body Karnataka High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Directions on Political Party Registration and Hartal Enforcement. The Election Commission lacks express de-registration powers under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, but may act on complai... 2026-11-03 22:03:22
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction for Culpable Homicide but Upholds Other Convictions. The court found insufficient evidence to establish knowledge of likely death in bomb manufacturing under IPC. 2026-11-03 22:03:20
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Murder acquittal natural justice Compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation jurisdiction circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Police Officer in Preventive Detention Case...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process...

Supreme Court Allows Recruitment Appeal in Police Constable Case Due to Flawed Medical Ass...

Lost Your Password?