Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court Examines Challenge to Reservation Notifications for Urban Local Body Wards in Karnataka. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Impugned Notifications and Reversion to Draft Reservations.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-18 21:39:16
  • 94
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010488852018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 36

W.P. No.44499/2018 c/w other writ petitions

2019-01-14

Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Abishek Marla M.J., K.N.Phaneendra, Vaishali Hegde, Vishwajith Shetty, Dinesh Rao, Prathima Honnapura, S.Rajashekar, Ashok Haranahalli, Manmohan P.N., Rajaram Sooryambail, Dhananjay Kumar, Udaya Prakash Muliya, Rahul S. Reddy, Devi Prasad Shetty, S. Basavaraj, M. Ravindranath, Naveen J. N., Nagarajappa A., Mahesh R. Uppin

Mr. Ravindra Nayak and other petitioners

Karnataka State Election Commission and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reservation of wards in urban local body elections

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned notifications and direction to reserve wards as per draft notification or for general category

Filing Reason

Impugned notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 altering reservation of wards

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions filed challenging reservation notifications; clubbed together for hearing before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
local body election ward reservation notification challenge urban local body Karnataka High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Dispute Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 70(b) Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of... 2026-09-19 17:23:53
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Attachment and Auction, Directs Corporation to Accept Payment from Applicant and Withdraw Attachment. The court held that the applicant's payment under protest and subsequent demand draf... 2026-09-19 17:23:48
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Income Tax Dispute — Jurisdiction under Section 263 U...

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. The prosecut...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute Due to Lack of Consent. App...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Lost Your Password?