Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court Examines Challenge to Reservation Notifications for Urban Local Body Wards in Karnataka. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Impugned Notifications and Reversion to Draft Reservations.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-05 16:16:39
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010488852018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 36

W.P. No.44499/2018 c/w other writ petitions

2019-01-14

Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Abishek Marla M.J., K.N.Phaneendra, Vaishali Hegde, Vishwajith Shetty, Dinesh Rao, Prathima Honnapura, S.Rajashekar, Ashok Haranahalli, Manmohan P.N., Rajaram Sooryambail, Dhananjay Kumar, Udaya Prakash Muliya, Rahul S. Reddy, Devi Prasad Shetty, S. Basavaraj, M. Ravindranath, Naveen J. N., Nagarajappa A., Mahesh R. Uppin

Mr. Ravindra Nayak and other petitioners

Karnataka State Election Commission and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to reservation of wards in urban local body elections

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned notifications and direction to reserve wards as per draft notification or for general category

Filing Reason

Impugned notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 altering reservation of wards

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions filed challenging reservation notifications; clubbed together for hearing before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
local body election ward reservation notification challenge urban local body Karnataka High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Examines Challenge to Reservation Notifications for Urban Local Body Wards in Karnataka. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Impugned Notifications and Reversion to Draft Reservations. 2026-08-05 16:16:39
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Road as Public and Granting Injunction Over Air Force Station. The Appeal Challenges the Declaration that the Stretch Between Gangamma Circle and Zam-Zam Point is a Public ... 2026-08-05 16:16:38
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder Compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?