Search Results for "ouster clause"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ouster clause"

260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 351 Available.

13 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 1st August...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections

14 Jan 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares LIC Owner of Suit Property, Orders Removal of Unauthorized Construction by Defendants. Defendants' claim based on revenue stay order and adverse possession fails as LIC's title from 1948 conveyance and statutory vesting under Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 is established.

5 Dec 2018

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership, removal of construction, and possession of land in Eksar,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Final Decree Proceedings — Rejection of Review Application Under Section 47 CPC Upheld. Court holds that objections to execution of a decree cannot be raised after final decree is passed and that a review application is not maintainable when the decree has merged with a higher court's order.

6 Dec 2019

The revision petition arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 16.06.2016 passed in FDP No.113/2010 on the file of the XXII Additional City...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.

14 Aug 2015

The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Company Appeal (L) No. 47 of 2012 Along with Connected Appeals and Applications. No substantive judgment text was provided; only the cause list and appearances were available.

6 Nov 2012

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Oral Judgment in Section 11 Arbitration Application Relating to License Agreement. The Application Arose from Disputes under a License Agreement Dated August 25, 2016, and Was Heard by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan on June 17, 2025.

17 Jun 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, delivered an oral judgment on June 17, 2025, on two arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Between Mother-in-Law and Daughter-in-Law. Trial Court Restrained Daughter-in-Law from Entering Suit Flat, Allegedly Circumventing Family Court's Order Protecting Her Right to Residence.

19 Sep 2016

The appeal arose from an order dated 19.07.2014 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Notice of Motion No.1959 of 2011 in S.C. Suit No....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka heard regular second appeals challenging concurrent lower court findings in a civil suit for declaration and injunction. The appeals were filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgments of the Senior Civil Judge, Channapatna.

16 Dec 2024

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Right of Way Dispute Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred for Orders Under Section 5 of the Act. The Court held that the remedy against a Mamlatdar's order granting right of way lies by way of appeal to the Collector under Section 7 of the Act, and the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a suit challenging such order.

8 Mar 2017

The appellant, original defendant No.1, was granted a right of way over the plaintiff's field by the Mamlatdar under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Cour...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)