High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Oral Judgment in Section 11 Arbitration Application Relating to License Agreement. The Application Arose from Disputes under a License Agreement Dated August 25, 2016, and Was Heard by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan on June 17, 2025.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 29
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, delivered an oral judgment on June 17, 2025, on two arbitration applications (No. 202 of 2023 and 203 of 2023) filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications arose from disputes related to a License Agreement dated August 25, 2016, by which certain premises were licensed. The applicants sought the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disagreements. The excerpt does not provide the court's final decision or the detailed reasoning behind it.

Issue of Consideration

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 202 OF 2023

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 38

Arbitration Application No. 202 of 2023 and Arbitration Application No. 203 of 2023

2025-06-17

Somasekhar Sundaresan

Hrushikesh Narvekar, Shaheda Madraswala, Jenifer Mogrelia, Sandeep Mohan Hirvadekar

Anuj Kabra & Anr., Preeti Kabra

CL Educate Ltd. (Formerly Known As Career Launcher India Ltd.)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Appointment of arbitrator

Filing Reason

Disputes arising from a License Agreement dated August 25, 2016

Judgment Excerpts

These Applications have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”). The disputes and differences between the parties relate to a License Agreement dated August 25, 2016 by which certain premises were licensed for a p

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Dismissed as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Time-Barred.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Bar Council's Show Cause Notice Concerning Advocate's Enrollment Due to Minor Application Error. Valid 10+2+3+3 Educational Pattern Found to Satisfy Rule 5 of the Rules of Legal Education, 2008 Despite Inaccurate Information Provid...