Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-21 02:06:09
  • 104
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010002972019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 73

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 & Others

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J. (Petitioner); Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Sr. Counsel w/Smt. Vaishali Hegde (R-1); Sri Vishwajith Shetty (R-2); Sri Dinesh Rao, Addl. AG w/Smt. Prathima Honnapura, AGA (R-3); Sri S.Rajashekar (R-4); R-5 served

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging notifications reserving wards for various categories in urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

To quash the impugned notifications and direct reservation of wards as per draft notifications or for general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were aggrieved by the allocation of reservations to wards, claiming it was arbitrary and not in accordance with rotation norms and statutory provisions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Review Order in Partition Suit — Held That High Court Erred in Reviewing Its Own Judgment Without Jurisdiction Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. 2026-11-01 20:22:01
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Society Challenging Orders Allowing Associate Member to Use Terrace. Terrace held to be part of the flat under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and the society cannot restrict its ... 2026-11-01 20:21:55
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation Jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?