Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-03 06:39:04
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010002972019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 73

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 & Others

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J. (Petitioner); Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Sr. Counsel w/Smt. Vaishali Hegde (R-1); Sri Vishwajith Shetty (R-2); Sri Dinesh Rao, Addl. AG w/Smt. Prathima Honnapura, AGA (R-3); Sri S.Rajashekar (R-4); R-5 served

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging notifications reserving wards for various categories in urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

To quash the impugned notifications and direct reservation of wards as per draft notifications or for general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were aggrieved by the allocation of reservations to wards, claiming it was arbitrary and not in accordance with rotation norms and statutory provisions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections 2026-08-03 06:39:04
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Detention Certificate and Setting Aside of Auction in Customs Detention Case — Auction Upheld as Goods Were Not Cleared Despite Court Orders and Had Already Been Auctioned by Warehousing Corporation. 2026-08-03 06:39:03
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?