Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-07 03:24:31
  • 100
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010002972019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 73

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 & Others

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J. (Petitioner); Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Sr. Counsel w/Smt. Vaishali Hegde (R-1); Sri Vishwajith Shetty (R-2); Sri Dinesh Rao, Addl. AG w/Smt. Prathima Honnapura, AGA (R-3); Sri S.Rajashekar (R-4); R-5 served

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging notifications reserving wards for various categories in urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

To quash the impugned notifications and direct reservation of wards as per draft notifications or for general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were aggrieved by the allocation of reservations to wards, claiming it was arbitrary and not in accordance with rotation norms and statutory provisions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Divorce on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Using Constitutional Powers - Marriage Dissolved After 13 Years of Separation Despite Lower Courts Rejecting Statutory Grounds. 2026-10-09 20:19:48
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit Upholding High Court's Concurrent Factual Finding on Post-Judgment Constructions. The Court held that the finding regarding constructions at A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H being subsequent to the earlier High Court d... 2026-10-09 20:19:41
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition natural justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Land Acquisition Article 226 benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Upholds State's Authority to Charge Transfer Premium in Liquidation Proceedings...

High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Order for Data Extraction from Mobile Phone i...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Right to Counterclaim in Arbitration Amidst IBC Proceedi...

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Petitions for Dispute Resolution in Joint Venture Agreeme...

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Criminal Breach of Trust Case Due to Insufficient Evid...

Lost Your Password?