Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-16 00:39:24
  • 86
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010002972019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 73

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 & Others

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J. (Petitioner); Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Sr. Counsel w/Smt. Vaishali Hegde (R-1); Sri Vishwajith Shetty (R-2); Sri Dinesh Rao, Addl. AG w/Smt. Prathima Honnapura, AGA (R-3); Sri S.Rajashekar (R-4); R-5 served

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging notifications reserving wards for various categories in urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

To quash the impugned notifications and direct reservation of wards as per draft notifications or for general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were aggrieved by the allocation of reservations to wards, claiming it was arbitrary and not in accordance with rotation norms and statutory provisions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 Advocates Act, 1961 — Permanent Committee System Upheld. Court dismisses challenge to objective criteria and permanent committee system for designation of Senior Advocates, reje... 2026-09-17 17:20:44
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Default Bail and Cognizance in NDPS Case. Court’s Analysis Focuses on Maintainability Under Section 397 CrPC and Application of Precedents. 2026-09-17 17:20:44
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition natural justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Appeal — Sets Aside NCL...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Lost Your Password?