Search Results for "consumer complaint"

720 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 720 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurance Company's SLP Against NCDRC Order, Holds Remedy Lies Under Article 226/227 Not Article 136. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(a) - National Commission's appellate orders are not subject to Article 136 jurisdiction directly.

The case arises from a consumer dispute where the complainant, Suresh Chand Jain, had obtained a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy and a Burglar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Indore Development Authority's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Plot Allotment After 28 Years. Respondent's Default in Payment and Laches Lead to Setting Aside of Consumer Fora Orders Directing Possession.

The case pertains to a dispute between the Indore Development Authority (appellant) and Dr. Hemant Mandovra (respondent) regarding the allotment of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Disposes of Second Appeals by Government Department in Consumer Disputes. Delay Condoned and Appeals Heard Together Due to Similarity of Facts and Issues.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, dealt with two second appeals filed by the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Seed Company, Upholds Consumer Status of Small Agriculturist in Buyback Dispute. Cultivation of Safed Musli for Livelihood Held Not Commercial Purpose Under Section 2(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves a dispute between M/s Nandan Biomatrix Ltd., a seed company, and S. Ambika Devi, a small landholder. In 2003, the appellant advertis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...