Search Results for "Promoter"

710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Unregistered Agreement Under MOFA — Loan Defence Rejected. Agreement for sale under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is enforceable despite non-registration.

The plaintiffs, shop purchasers, filed a suit for specific performance of an unregistered agreement for sale dated 31.8.1991 against the defendant dev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Official Liquidator's Report Seeking Declaration of Sale as Null and Void in Company Liquidation. Transfer of Leasehold Rights by Company in Liquidation Without Court Sanction Held Invalid Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Company Judge allowing the Official Liquidator's report seeking a declaration that the sale of immovab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Refusal to Admit Member Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Court upholds society's right to reject membership based on non-compliance with by-laws and lack of eligibility.

The petitioner, Dilip Bobde Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...