Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Registrar's Order Setting Aside Election of Managing Committee in Co-operative Housing Society for Violation of Bye-Laws. Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Upheld as Proper Remedy When Election is Void Ab Initio Due to Participation of Non-Members.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 189
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 11th September 2014 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Division (DJR) in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act). The DJR set aside the election of the managing committee of a co-operative housing society and directed fresh elections. The petitioners, who were elected members of the managing committee, contended that the DJR had no jurisdiction to interfere with the election as the dispute should have been raised before the Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the MCS Act. The respondents, including the State and other members, argued that the election was conducted in gross violation of the society's bye-laws and the MCS Act, as non-members were allowed to contest and vote. The High Court examined the scope of revisional jurisdiction under Section 154, which allows the Registrar to call for and examine the record of any proceeding and pass orders to ensure legality and propriety. The court held that the DJR has the power to set aside an election that is void ab initio due to violation of statutory provisions and bye-laws. The court also noted that the alternative remedy under Section 91 is not a bar to the exercise of revisional jurisdiction when the election is fundamentally flawed. The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the DJR's order and directing that fresh elections be conducted in accordance with the bye-laws and the Act.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Revisional Jurisdiction - Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Election of Managing Committee - The DJR, in exercise of revisional powers, set aside the election of the managing committee of a co-operative housing society on the ground that the election was held in violation of the bye-laws and the Act, as non-members were allowed to contest and vote. The High Court held that the DJR has jurisdiction under Section 154 to examine the legality and propriety of the election proceedings and to pass appropriate orders, including setting aside the election and directing fresh elections. (Paras 1-12)

B) Co-operative Law - Bye-laws - Candidature of Non-Members - Section 27 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The bye-laws of the society provided that only members of the society could contest and vote in the election of the managing committee. The DJR found that the election was conducted in violation of the bye-laws as non-members were allowed to participate. The High Court upheld this finding, stating that the election must be conducted strictly in accordance with the bye-laws and the Act. (Paras 4-8)

C) Co-operative Law - Election Dispute - Alternative Remedy - Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The petitioners argued that the election dispute should have been raised before the Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the MCS Act. The High Court rejected this argument, holding that the DJR's revisional jurisdiction under Section 154 is not ousted by the availability of an alternative remedy, especially when the election is alleged to be void ab initio due to violation of statutory provisions. (Paras 9-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Divisional Joint Registrar (DJR) has jurisdiction under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 to set aside the election of the managing committee of a co-operative society on the ground that the election was held in violation of the bye-laws and the Act, and whether the DJR can direct fresh elections.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed all three writ petitions, upholding the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dated 11th September 2014. The court held that the DJR had jurisdiction under Section 154 of the MCS Act to set aside the election and direct fresh elections, and that the alternative remedy under Section 91 was not a bar. The court directed that fresh elections be conducted in accordance with the bye-laws and the Act.

Law Points

  • Revisional jurisdiction under Section 154 of MCS Act
  • Election of managing committee
  • Violation of bye-laws
  • Candidature of non-members
  • Power of Registrar to interfere in election disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 31

Writ Petition No. 8410 of 2014 with Writ Petition No. 8414 of 2014 and Writ Petition No. 8412 of 2014

2014-12-18

Ranjit More, J.

Mr. P. K. Dhakephalkar and Mr. P. S. Dani, Senior Advocates with Mr. Ajay Patil for the Petitioner; Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Kamat i/b Mr. M. S. Surana for Respondent No.3; Mr. Praveen Samdani, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. N. jakhadi for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6; Mr. Vijay D. Patil and Mr. Jagdish Reddy for Respondent No. 6; Ms. P. S. Cardozo, AGP for the State Authorities

Sayeeda Gulamrasul Sayed, Sajid Ali Abid Ali, Liliahi Mehboob Ansari

State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging an order of the Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies setting aside the election of the managing committee of a co-operative housing society.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to quash the order dated 11th September 2014 passed by the DJR in Revision Application No.296 of 2014 and to uphold the election of the managing committee.

Filing Reason

The petitioners, who were elected members of the managing committee, challenged the DJR's order on the ground that the DJR lacked jurisdiction to set aside the election and that the dispute should have been raised before the Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the MCS Act.

Previous Decisions

The DJR, in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 154 of the MCS Act, set aside the election of the managing committee and directed fresh elections, finding that the election was conducted in violation of the bye-laws and the Act as non-members were allowed to contest and vote.

Issues

Whether the Divisional Joint Registrar has jurisdiction under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 to set aside the election of the managing committee of a co-operative society on the ground of violation of bye-laws and the Act. Whether the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 91 of the MCS Act bars the exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 154.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the DJR had no jurisdiction to interfere with the election as the dispute should have been raised before the Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the MCS Act, and that the election was validly conducted. Respondents argued that the election was conducted in gross violation of the bye-laws and the MCS Act, as non-members were allowed to contest and vote, and that the DJR had the power under Section 154 to set aside such an election.

Ratio Decidendi

The revisional jurisdiction under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 empowers the Registrar to examine the legality and propriety of any proceeding, including elections of managing committees. When an election is held in violation of the bye-laws and the Act, such as allowing non-members to contest and vote, the election is void ab initio and the Registrar can set it aside and direct fresh elections. The availability of an alternative remedy under Section 91 does not oust this revisional power.

Judgment Excerpts

By the said order, the DJR has set aside the election of the managing committee of the society and directed fresh elections. The DJR has found that the election was conducted in violation of the bye-laws and the Act as non-members were allowed to contest and vote. The revisional jurisdiction under Section 154 of the MCS Act is wide enough to examine the legality and propriety of the election proceedings.

Procedural History

The Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Division, passed an order dated 11th September 2014 in Revision Application No.296 of 2014, setting aside the election of the managing committee of a co-operative housing society and directing fresh elections. Aggrieved by this order, three writ petitions were filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The High Court heard the petitions together and dismissed them by a common judgment dated 18th December 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 154, Section 91, Section 27
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Registrar's Order Setting Aside Election of Managing Committee in Co-operative Housing Society for Violation of Bye-Laws. Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societie...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, follow...