Search Results for "Income tax refund"

627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tax Determination Under Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Certificate of tax payable set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

The petitioner, The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders passed by Respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging GST Demand and Rejection of Revocation of Registration — Petitioner Failed to Prove Receipt of Goods and Payment to Supplier Under Section 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017. Input Tax Credit Denied as Burden of Proof Not Discharged.

The petitioner, a proprietorship firm engaged in exporting mobile handsets and registered under the CGST Act, 2017, filed applications for refund of I...