Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Case — Fees for Technical Services Rendered Outside India Not Taxable. Court holds that fees for technical services rendered entirely outside India do not accrue or arise in India and are not deemed to accrue or arise under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Grasim Industries Ltd., set up a gas-based sponge iron plant in India and entered into a Foreign Technical Collaboration Agreement dated 22nd October 1989 with Davy Mckee Corporation (DAVY), a non-resident, for engineering and related services to be rendered outside India. The petitioner also entered into a supervisory agreement for services in India. Under the agreement, DAVY was to provide design, drawings, and data outside India and train employees outside India. The petitioner agreed to pay US$ 16,231,000 net of Indian income tax, meaning any withholding tax would be borne by the petitioner. The petitioner sought a no-objection certificate from the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) to remit the amount without deducting tax at source, contending that the fees for services rendered outside India were not taxable in India. The ACIT rejected the application, and the petitioner filed a writ petition. The court examined whether fees for technical services rendered entirely outside India are taxable under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the income from such services does not accrue or arise in India and is not deemed to accrue or arise in India under the Act. The court emphasized the principle of territorial nexus and noted that no part of the services was performed in India. Consequently, the petitioner was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the revenue's orders, and directed the revenue to refund any tax collected with interest.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Territorial Nexus - Fees for Technical Services - Section 9(1)(vii) Income Tax Act, 1961 - The issue was whether fees paid to a non-resident for technical services rendered entirely outside India are deemed to accrue or arise in India. The court held that since the services were rendered outside India and no part of the income accrued in India, the fees are not taxable under Section 9(1)(vii). The court relied on the principle that income must have a territorial nexus with India to be taxable. (Paras 1-30)

B) Income Tax - Withholding Tax - Section 195 Income Tax Act, 1961 - The petitioner sought a no-objection certificate to remit fees without deducting tax at source. The court held that where the income is not chargeable to tax in India, there is no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 195. The court allowed the writ petition and directed the revenue to refund any tax collected. (Paras 3-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether fees for technical services rendered entirely outside India by a non-resident are taxable in India under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and whether the petitioner was liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders of the revenue authorities, and directed the revenue to refund any tax collected with interest.

Law Points

  • Fees for technical services rendered outside India not taxable
  • Section 9(1)(vii) Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • no territorial nexus
  • withholding tax not required
  • no permanent establishment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 108

WRIT PETITION NO. 2505 OF 2012

2023-09-01

K. R. SHRIRAM, DR. N. K. GOKHALE

2023:BHC-OS:9537-DB

Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate, with Madhur Agrawal & Fenil Bhatt, i/b. Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma, with Shipla Goel, Advocate for Respondents-Revenue.

Grasim Industries Ltd.

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Commissioner of Income-tax-6, Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Circle – 12(2), Commissioner of Income-tax-12

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the rejection of application for no-objection certificate to remit fees without deducting tax at source.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a declaration that fees paid to non-resident for technical services rendered outside India are not taxable in India and sought refund of tax collected.

Filing Reason

The revenue authorities rejected the petitioner's application for no-objection certificate and demanded tax on fees paid to non-resident for services rendered outside India.

Previous Decisions

The ACIT rejected the application for no-objection certificate; the appellate authorities upheld the rejection.

Issues

Whether fees for technical services rendered entirely outside India by a non-resident are taxable in India under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Whether the petitioner was liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on such fees.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the services were rendered outside India, no part of the income accrued in India, and therefore the fees are not taxable under Section 9(1)(vii). Revenue argued that the fees are for technical services and are deemed to accrue or arise in India under Section 9(1)(vii) regardless of where the services are rendered.

Ratio Decidendi

Fees for technical services rendered entirely outside India by a non-resident do not accrue or arise in India and are not deemed to accrue or arise under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, no tax is deductible at source under Section 195.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner had set up a Gas-based Sponge Iron Plant in India for which it entered into a Foreign Technical Collaboration Agreement dated 22nd October 1989 with one M/s. Davy Mckee Corporation. Petitioner agreed to pay a sum of US $ 16,231,000/- net of Indian Income-tax, if any, leviable.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for a no-objection certificate on 5th December 1989, which was rejected by the ACIT. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, which was heard and decided on 1st September 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 9(1)(vii), Section 195
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Late Filing of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Service of Writ of Summons Not Mandatory When Defendant Has Entered Appearance and Received Plaint and Notice of Motion. The court held that the ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Exparte Winding Up Order — Directors Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Service of Notice at Registered Office Deemed Sufficient Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, ...