Search Results for "same pay scale"

2592 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2592 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits Against APMC. Court Directs Payment of Provident Fund, Leave Encashment, and Salary Differences as Per Seventh Pay Commission, Upholding Order of District Deputy Registrar.

The petitioner, Laxman Vitthalrao Motegaonkar, was appointed as Junior Clerk by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Sangamner, on 09.09....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order for Alternate Employment with Pay Protection. Employer's Obligation to Provide Suitable Alternate Employment Under MRTU & PULP Act Includes Pay Protection for Medically Unfit Driver.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Regularization of Suspension Period and Retiral Benefits for Teacher in Service Law Matter. Period of Suspension Treated as Duty for Pension and Other Benefits Under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sudha Menendbhai Odedra, was appointed as a Vidya Sahayak (teacher) on 14/03/1989 and later promoted to Principal of a higher secondar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MPSC's Refusal to Recommend Candidates for Teacher Posts Due to Age Bar — MPSC's Discretion to Prescribe Age Limit Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The State of Maharashtra and its education authorities filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Release of Retirement Dues to Former President of Administrative Tribunal — Pension and Gratuity to Be Paid with 8% Interest. The court held that retirement benefits are not dependent on validity of appointment but on actual service rendered.

The petitioner, an advocate since 1979, was appointed as President of the Goa Administrative Tribunal on 24.10.2001. His appointment was challenged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Family Pension in Deemed Confirmation Case. Husband Deemed Confirmed Under Rule 26(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 Despite Death During Extended Probation.

The petitioner, Nita Bhagwan Ware, is the widow of Bhagwan Ware, who was appointed as an Assistant Teacher (Shikshan Sevak) on 1 July 2009. He died on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that aided non-government educational institutions are bound to adopt government pension scheme for employees who retired after the cut-off date.

The petitioners, thirteen retired employees of Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic, Amravati (respondent No.4), which is run by Shivaji Education Socie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Archana Dahifale, was employed as a Project Officer on a contractual basis with the respondent No.2 Institute since 2015. Her contract...