Search Results for "rashness and negligence"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's Scooty Hit from Behind by ST Bus; 50% Contributory Negligence Attributed to Claimant for Sudden Turn Without Indication.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 04.11.2001 when the claimant, Lalitkumar Tulsidas Daiya, was riding his Scooty bearing Registra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim for Child Death — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established. MSRTC held vicariously liable for death of 10-year-old student hit by bus at bus-stand; compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with 8% interest upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a 10-year-old boy, Parikshit Bhosale, who died after being hit by a State Transpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Held Liable Despite Absence of Driving License. Breach of Policy Condition Not Established as Owner Failed to Produce License, But Insurance Company Must Pay and Recover.

The appellant, Balwantsinh Mahasukhbhai Chavda, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for injuries sustained ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.

The appellants, Ashabai, Seema, and Umesh, are the legal representatives of the deceased Kalyan Kothi. They filed a claim petition under Section 163A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Employee. Deceased conductor returning on scooter from depot held equally negligent; compensation reduced by 50% with proper deductions under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 13/12/2005 in Claim Petition No.301/2001, awarding compensation...