Anticipatory Bail Application Rejected in Fatal Drunken Driving Case. Court Denies MBA Graduate's Bail Amid Evidence of Reckless Driving and Alcohol Consumption

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 313
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Crime No. 122/2024, involving a fatal accident. Initially charged under Sections 304-A, 279, 337, and 338 of the IPC and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, later charges included Sections 304 and 427 IPC, and Section 185 M.V. Act. The applicant claimed permissible alcohol levels and inconsistencies in the accident narrative, while the prosecution presented evidence of reckless driving and alcohol consumption. The court examined the applicability of Section 304 IPC, legal precedents, and the necessity of bail cancellation when non-bailable offences are added. Ultimately, the court rejected the anticipatory bail application, citing the gravity of the offence, the applicant's conduct, and the findings of the investigation.

Issue of Consideration

Ritu w/o Dinesh Maloo Versus State of Mah., thr.PSO PS Tahsil, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 263

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.375/2024

2024-06-26

URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J

Shri S.V.Manohar, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Prakash Jaiswal, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri D.V.Chauhan, Public Prosecutor assisted by Ms H.N.Prabhu, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Non-applicant/State. Shri Yusuf Jameel Shaikh, Counsel for the Complainant.

Ritu w/o Dinesh Maloo

State of Mah., thr.PSO PS Tahsil, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Anticipatory Bail Application Rejected in Fatal Drunken Driving Case. Court Denies MBA Graduate's Bail Amid Evidence of Reckless Driving and Alcohol Consumption
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Land Development Dispute, Restoring Tribunal's Findings on Breach and Damages. The Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Hold...