High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against School Management in Child Injury Case — No Criminal Intent Established Under Section 125(a) BNS, 2023. The court held that an incident where a student lost vision due to fellow students spraying confetti in a school bus was a childish mischief or accident, not attributable to the school, and quashed the FIR.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Divyajyothi School Management, represented by its Head Master, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seeking quashing of FIR No.94/2025 registered at Koppa Police Station, Mandya, for the offence punishable under Section 125(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). The FIR was lodged by the second respondent, Smt. Shilpa Chandra Shekar, mother of a child studying in the 4th standard at the petitioner's school. On 01.08.2025, while the child was travelling home in School Bus No.5, some children allegedly carried and sprayed coloured confetti/sparklers inside the bus, and one such spray entered the eyes of the complainant's child, resulting in the child losing vision in one eye. The complainant alleged that the school management was responsible for the incident due to lack of supervision. The court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel, the State's counsel, and the respondent's counsel. The court observed that the incident appeared to be a childish mischief or a fleeting accident, and there was no material to show any criminal intent or negligence on the part of the school management. The court held that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the FIR and all further proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Section 125(a) BNS, 2023 - Absence of Mens Rea - The court considered whether school management can be held criminally liable for injuries caused to a student by fellow students spraying confetti in a school bus. Held that no criminal intent or negligence was attributable to the school, and the incident was a childish mischief or accident. FIR quashed. (Paras 3-5)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC / Section 528 BNSS - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - The court exercised inherent powers to quash FIR where allegations did not disclose any criminal offence against the petitioner. Held that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an FIR under Section 125(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, can be sustained against school management for injuries caused to a student by the acts of fellow students during school bus travel, in the absence of any criminal intent or negligence attributable to the school.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR in Crime No.94/2025 registered at Koppa Police Station, Mandya, for the offence punishable under Section 125(a) of the BNS, 2023, and all further proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Criminal liability requires mens rea
  • vicarious liability not attracted for acts of students
  • quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC/Section 528 BNSS
  • Section 125(a) BNS requires intent to cause harm
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (06) 108

CRL.P No. 13718 of 2025

2026-06-23

M. Nagaprasanna

NC: 2026:KHC:31211

Sri. Nitin A M (for petitioner), Smt. Waheeda M M (HCGP for R-1), Sri. D.A. Shivakumar (for R-2)

Divyajyothi School Management, Rep. by its Head Master, A Jiby Anthony

The State of Karnataka, by Koppa Police Station, and Smt. Shilpa Chandra Shekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC/Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR for offence under Section 125(a) BNS.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.94/2025 registered at Koppa Police Station, Mandya, for offence under Section 125(a) BNS.

Filing Reason

The petitioner-school management was implicated in an FIR alleging that due to lack of supervision, a student lost vision in one eye after fellow students sprayed confetti in a school bus.

Issues

Whether the FIR under Section 125(a) BNS discloses any criminal offence against the school management. Whether continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the incident was a childish mischief or accident, and no criminal intent or negligence can be attributed to the school management. Respondent No.2 argued that the school management was responsible for the safety of children and the incident occurred due to lack of supervision.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the incident was a childish mischief or accident, and there was no material to show any criminal intent or negligence on the part of the school management. Therefore, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, warranting quashing of the FIR under Section 482 CrPC/Section 528 BNSS.

Judgment Excerpts

What may have appeared, at first blush, to be a childish mischief or a fleeting accident, allegedly culminated in a calamity of lifelong consequence: the child lost vision in one eye. The court held that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the FIR.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC/Section 528 BNSS before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on an unspecified date, seeking quashing of FIR No.94/2025 registered on 05.09.2025 at Koppa Police Station, Mandya, for offence under Section 125(a) BNS. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 23.06.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 125(a)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Acquisition Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Land Acquired Under 1894 Act but Not Compensated Due to Unfulfilled Alternate Land Offer Entitles Petitioners to Compensation Under 2013 Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as sole eye-witness was a close relative of...