Search Results for "dealer protection"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 106-B of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 Restricting Alcohol Content in Homoeopathic Medicines. The Court held that the rule is intra vires the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The Petitioner, Shrikrishna Homeo Pharmacy, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, carries on the business of manufactu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010085932008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Hears Challenge to Denial of Entry Tax Refund Under M.P. Entry Tax Act; Whether Notification Explanation Violates Article 14.

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by the appellants, Vikram Cement & Anr., units of Grasim Industries Limited, challenging the validity of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...