Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Income Tax Dispute Over Disallowance of Fees and Taxes Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that gallonage fee, licence fee, and shop rental for FL9 licences were disallowable as exclusive levies on a State Government undertaking, while those for FL1 licences were not exclusive, and surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax were not fees or charges under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Kerala in income tax matters involving Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing & Marketing Corporation Ltd., a State Government undertaking. For assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, the revenue authorities disallowed deductions for payments made by the appellant, including gallonage fee, licence fee, shop rental (kist), surcharge on sales tax, and turnover tax, under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant contested these disallowances before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and subsequently the High Court. The High Court partly allowed the appeals, holding that payments for FL9 licences were disallowable as exclusive levies under Section 40(a)(iib), while those for FL1 licences were not exclusive and thus allowable, and that surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax were not fees or charges under the provision. The Supreme Court heard arguments from both sides, with the appellant contending that the levies were not exclusive to State Government undertakings and that taxes fell outside Section 40(a)(iib). The Court analyzed Section 40(a)(iib), which prohibits deductions for certain fees or charges levied exclusively on State Government undertakings. It upheld the High Court's reasoning, finding that the FL9 licence fees were exclusive to the appellant during the relevant years, making them disallowable, whereas FL1 licence fees were not exclusive due to another State undertaking holding similar licences. Regarding surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax, the Court agreed they were taxes, not fees or charges, and thus not covered by Section 40(a)(iib). The Court partly allowed the appeals, affirming the High Court's decision and remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for revised assessment in accordance with the settled position.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Deductions - Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(iib) - Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 40(a)(iib) - The appellant, a State Government undertaking, paid gallonage fee, licence fee, shop rental (kist), surcharge on sales tax, and turnover tax - The High Court held that gallonage fee, licence fee, and shop rental for FL9 licences fell under Section 40(a)(iib) and were disallowable, but those for FL1 licences were not exclusive levies and thus not disallowable - The surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax were held not to be fees or charges under Section 40(a)(iib) - Held that the High Court's interpretation was correct, and the appeals were partly allowed, remanding the matter for revised assessment (Paras 1-24).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the gallonage fee, licence fee, shop rental (kist), surcharge on sales tax, and turnover tax paid by the appellant fall within the purview of Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, thereby making them non-deductible in computing business income.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals, upholding the High Court's decision. It held that gallonage fee, licence fee, and shop rental for FL9 licences were disallowable under Section 40(a)(iib), while those for FL1 licences were not disallowable, and surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax were not fees or charges under the provision. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for revised orders.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 40(a)(iib) of Income-tax Act
  • 1961
  • Distinction between exclusive levy on State Government undertaking and general levy
  • Nature of fees and charges versus taxes
  • Disallowance of deductions for certain payments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 Lawtext (SC) (1) 46

C.A.@S.L.P.(C)No.12859 of 2020 etc.

2022-01-03

R. Subhash Reddy, J.

Sri S. Ganesh, Sri N. Venkataraman

Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing & Marketing Corporation Ltd.

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax appeals regarding disallowance of deductions under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

The appellant seeks to overturn the disallowance of deductions for payments made to the State Government

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the High Court's common judgment and order dated 30.04.2020 in ITA Nos.135, 146, and 313 of 2019

Previous Decisions

High Court partly allowed the appeals, holding some payments disallowable and others not, and remanded the matter for revised assessment

Issues

Whether the gallonage fee, licence fee, shop rental (kist), surcharge on sales tax, and turnover tax paid by the appellant fall within the purview of Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, thereby making them non-deductible in computing business income.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the levies were not exclusive to State Government undertakings and that taxes fell outside Section 40(a)(iib) The revenue argued that all amounts were covered under Section 40(a)(iib) and thus not deductible

Ratio Decidendi

Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, applies only to fees or charges levied exclusively on State Government undertakings; taxes such as surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax do not fall within its purview, and the exclusivity of a levy depends on whether it is imposed solely on such undertakings during the relevant assessment years.

Judgment Excerpts

“23. While summing up the conclusions, we are persuaded to answer the question of law raised, partly in favour of the revenue and partly in favour of the assessee.” “24. In the result the assessment completed against the appellants with respect to the assessment years 2014 2015, 20152016 are hereby set aside. The matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer to pass revised orders...”

Procedural History

Assessment orders were passed for 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Principal Commissioner exercised revision under Section 263. Appeals were filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which dismissed them. The High Court partly allowed the appeals. The Supreme Court granted leave and heard the appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Income-tax Act, 1961: Section 40(a)(iib), Section 143(3), Section 263
  • Kerala Abkari Act: Section 18A
  • Foreign Liquor Rules: Rule 15A
  • Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957:
  • Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963: Section 5(1)
  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Finance Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Income Tax Dispute Over Disallowance of Fees and Taxes Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that gallonage fee, licence fee, and shop rental for FL9 licence...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Bail Orders in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning and Non-Compliance with Judicial Directions. The High Court's cryptic bail grants without addressing offence gravity or accused's evasion of court proceedings violated establis...