Search Results for "client account"

900 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 900 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Removes Executor in Testamentary Dispute Under Indian Succession Act, 1925 -- Over Estate Administration Breach

The judgment involves a dispute over the administration of the estate of late Rajnikant Ambalal Kilachand, where the Respondent, under a Will dated 27...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears section 34 petition challenging arbitral award; outcome not specified. The petition challenged an appellate arbitral award that had affirmed an earlier primary award, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Jagadeesa G. Chary, filed Arbitration Petition No. 410 of 2014 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decrees Ownership of 800 ITC Shares to Plaintiffs, Finding Transfers Forged and Broker's Claim Unproven. Defendant No.14 Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Forged Transfer Deeds Are Void; Register of Members Ordered to Be Rectified.

The suit concerned a declaration of ownership and rectification of the register of members of ITC Ltd. (Defendant No.1) in respect of 800 shares. Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...