Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Decides Revenue Appeal Against Tribunal's Order on Excise Valuation of Fiat Cars. Assessee's Price Below Cost Held as Normal Price Under Section 4(1)(a) by Tribunal, Revenue Challenges on Ground That Price Did Not Reflect Manufacturing Cost and Profit.

The dispute concerned the valuation of Fiat Uno model cars for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, M/s ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Corporation Against Reduction of Punishment in Disciplinary Case — Withholding of Increments with Cumulative Effect Held Disproportionate for Unauthorized Absence by Junior Assistant.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by M/s Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (the appellant) against an order dated 05.08.2024 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Back Wages for Employee in Faulty Enquiry Case. Employer Directed to Pay Full Back Wages from Termination to Reinstatement Despite Option for De Novo Enquiry.

The petitioner, Manohar Pandit Marathe, was an employee of Sharda Vidya Prasarak Mandal. He was terminated from service on 20/01/2009. He challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CENVAT Credit for Input Services Used for Storage Tanks Outside Factory in Central Excise Case — Services Used in Relation to Storage of Inputs Eligible for Credit Even if Received Outside Factory Premises.

The appellant, M/s. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., is a manufacturer of excisable goods under Chapters 28, 29, and 31 of the ...