High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Order Against Assistant Engineer in Disciplinary Proceeding — Violation of Natural Justice Due to Non-Supply of Inquiry Report. Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, Regulation 14-A — Order set aside as inquiry report not furnished to delinquent before imposing penalty.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 189
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an Assistant Engineer in the PMGSY Sub-Division, Kalaburagi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 09.11.2011 passed by the 2nd respondent under Regulation 14-A of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957. The petitioner contended that the impugned order imposing a penalty was passed without furnishing him a copy of the inquiry report, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the inquiry was conducted properly and the penalty was justified. The court, after hearing arguments, found that the non-supply of the inquiry report was a clear violation of natural justice. Relying on settled law, the court held that the delinquent employee is entitled to receive the inquiry report before the disciplinary authority imposes any penalty. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed and the matter was remitted back to the disciplinary authority to provide the inquiry report to the petitioner and pass a fresh order after giving him an opportunity of hearing. The court directed that the entire exercise be completed within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Disciplinary Proceedings - Natural Justice - Non-Supply of Inquiry Report - Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, Regulation 14-A - Petitioner challenged penalty order on ground that inquiry report was not furnished to him before imposing penalty - Court held that failure to supply inquiry report amounts to violation of principles of natural justice and vitiates the penalty order - Impugned order quashed (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order imposing penalty on the petitioner is vitiated for non-supply of the inquiry report and violation of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 09.11.2011 is quashed. The matter is remitted back to the disciplinary authority to provide the inquiry report to the petitioner and pass a fresh order after giving him an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • right to receive inquiry report
  • disciplinary proceedings
  • penalty order
  • Karnataka Civil Services (Classification
  • Control and Appeal) Rules
  • 1957
  • Regulation 14-A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (07) 105

WP No. 200440 of 2021 (S-DE)

2023-07-26

Suraj Govindaraj

Avinash A. Uplaonkar, Ravi K. Anoor (for petitioner); Maya T.R., HCGP (for R1, R2, R4); Subhash Mallapur (for R3)

Khaja Sadduruddin

State of Karnataka, Under Secretary (Service-A), Hon'ble Upa-Lokayukta-1, Under Secretary (Service-C)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging penalty order in disciplinary proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned order dated 09.11.2011 and direction to supply inquiry report.

Filing Reason

Penalty order passed without furnishing inquiry report, violating natural justice.

Issues

Whether the impugned penalty order is vitiated for non-supply of inquiry report?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that inquiry report was not furnished before imposing penalty, violating natural justice. Respondents contended that inquiry was conducted properly and penalty was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

Non-supply of inquiry report to the delinquent employee before imposing penalty violates principles of natural justice and vitiates the penalty order.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. To call for records relating to issue of the impugned order bearing No.Gra. Aa. Pa. 32 INQ 2011, Bengaluru dated 09.11.2011... The impugned order is quashed. The matter is remitted back to the disciplinary authority to provide the inquiry report to the petitioner and pass a fresh order after giving him an opportunity of hearing.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed WP No. 200440 of 2021 before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, challenging the penalty order dated 09.11.2011. The petition was reserved for orders on 19.06.2023 and pronounced on 26.07.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957: Regulation 14-A
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Order Disallowing ITC Due to Revised Timeline. Input Tax Credit claim under Section 16(4) of GST Enactments held not barred as time limit for filing return was subsequently revised.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Dismissing Criminal Appeal Without Perusing Record Under Section 423 CrPC. Appellate Court's Order Must Indicate Judicial Application of Mind and Consideration of Entire Case Record, Not Merely the Judgment U...