Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Removal of Gram Panchayat Members for Violation of Natural Justice. Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Requires Show Cause Notice Before Removal.

The petitioners, former President and Vice-President of Chandavar Gram Panchayat and former President of Valgalli Gram Panchayat, challenged the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination of Disqualified Candidate in Gram Panchayat Elections. Returning Officer Failed to Consider Disqualification Order Passed by Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division.

The petitioner, Amol Sahebrao Solanke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the acceptance of the nomination ...