Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 1203
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of respondent No.2 in each petition under Section 14(1)(h) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 for non-payment of taxes. The petitioner argued that after the 2018 amendment to Section 16(2), which replaced 'State Government' with 'Commissioner', the appeal lies only before the Commissioner, not the Additional Commissioner. The court examined Section 16(2) and the Government notification dated 20.04.1977 issued under Section 13(3) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, which delegates the Commissioner's powers to the Additional Commissioner. Relying on the Division Bench decision in Vimal Bhimrao Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, the court held that the delegation under Section 13(3) is independent and continues to empower the Additional Commissioner to exercise appellate functions under Section 16(2). The amendment does not affect this delegation. The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Additional Commissioner's orders.

Headnote

A) Delegation of Powers - Additional Commissioner's Competence - Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - The issue was whether the Additional Commissioner could hear appeals under Section 16(2) after the 2018 amendment substituted 'State Government' with 'Commissioner'. The court held that the delegation under Section 13(3) of the MLR Code, which empowers the Additional Commissioner to exercise the Commissioner's functions under any law, remains unaffected by the amendment. The Additional Commissioner continues to be competent to hear such appeals (Paras 9-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Additional Commissioner is empowered to entertain appeals under Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 after the amendment dated 19.07.2018 which replaced 'State Government' with 'Commissioner'

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petitions dismissed. The orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 are upheld. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Delegation of powers under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
  • 1966 is independent of amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1958
  • Additional Commissioner competent to hear appeals under Section 16(2) despite substitution of 'State Government' with 'Commissioner'
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (09) 2707

Writ Petition No.2000/2023, Writ Petition No.1783/2023, Writ Petition No.1784/2023, Writ Petition No.2064/2023

2024-09-12

Anil L. Pansare

2024:BHC-NAG:10329

Mr. D. S. Jagyasi (for petitioner in WP 2000 and 1783 of 2023), Mr. V. S. Mishra with Mr. K. Jhamb (for petitioner in WP 1784 and 2064 of 2024), Mr. D. V. Chawhan (Government Pleader for respondent No.1), Mr. N. Y. Thengre (for respondent No.2), Mr. D. Verma (for respondent No.3)

Amitkumar s/o Bhimrao Bankar

Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur; Smt. Bharti Ravindra Panse; Gram Panchayat, Kaleta (in WP 2000/2023); The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur; Smt. Sunanda w/o Jaibhim Pillewan; Gram Panchayat, Kaleta (in WP 1783/2023); Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, District Nagpur; Uttara w/o Vijay Sontakke; Gram Panchayat, Kaleta (in WP 1784/2023); The Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, District Nagpur; Nareshchandra Pandurang Raut; Gram Panchayat, Kaleta (in WP 2064/2023)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging orders of Additional Commissioner setting aside Collector's disqualification of members under Section 14(1)(h) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Additional Commissioner's orders dated 18.01.2023 on the ground that the Additional Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to hear appeals under Section 16(2) after the 2018 amendment

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that after the 2018 amendment to Section 16(2), appeals lie only before the Commissioner, not the Additional Commissioner

Previous Decisions

Collector, Chandrapur passed order of disqualification on 10.10.2022; Additional Commissioner set aside the Collector's order on 18.01.2023

Issues

Whether the Additional Commissioner is empowered to entertain appeals under Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 after the amendment dated 19.07.2018 which replaced 'State Government' with 'Commissioner'

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that prior to amendment, State Government could delegate powers under Section 182, but after amendment, appeal lies only before Commissioner, and there is no provision for Commissioner to delegate to Additional Commissioner Government Pleader argued that delegation under Section 13(3) of MLR Code continues to empower Additional Commissioner to exercise Commissioner's functions, and amendment does not affect this delegation

Ratio Decidendi

The delegation of powers under Section 13(3) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, which empowers the Additional Commissioner to exercise the powers and functions of the Commissioner under any law for the time being in force, remains unaffected by the amendment to Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Therefore, the Additional Commissioner is legally competent to hear appeals under Section 16(2) even after the substitution of 'State Government' with 'Commissioner'.

Judgment Excerpts

The State Government has delegated powers in terms of Section 13 (3) of the MLR Code... The Division Bench has held that the Additional Commissioner is legally competent to exercise the appellate powers under Section 16(2) of the Act of 1958. I do not find substance in the aforesaid argument.

Procedural History

Collector, Chandrapur passed order of disqualification on 10.10.2022 under Section 14(1)(h) of the Act of 1958. Respondent No.2 appealed under Section 16(2) before the Additional Commissioner, who set aside the Collector's order on 18.01.2023. Petitioner filed writ petitions challenging the Additional Commissioner's orders on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The petitions were heard and decided on 12.09.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958: Section 14(1)(h), Section 16(2), Section 182
  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: Section 13(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Lecturer's Appeal Against Compulsory Retirement Under Orissa Service Code; Single Adverse Entry Held Insufficient When Overall Record Was Good. Compulsory Retirement Based Solely on One Year's Adverse Remarks Was Arbitrary and No...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Witness Committed Perjury by Resiling from Previous Statement. The Court found that PW 22 Deepak Trivedi, an eye witness, resiled from his earlier statement re...