Search Results for "CGST"

278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed GST Refund Despite Red Flagging of Exporter. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 56 of CGST Act for period beyond 60 days from filing shipping bill, as red flagging does not justify indefinite delay.

The petitioner, Ms. Anita Agarwal, sole proprietor of M/s. Shanker International, is an exporter of goods such as Ethyl Alcohol Liquid Packaging Film ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date immediately after expiry of three months from receipt of refund application till date of refund.

The petitioner, M & G Global Services Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in providing Information Technology enabled services to its group entities located outside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice in GST Discount Case — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Limitation and Retrospective Effect of Circular Can Be Raised Before Adjudicating Authority Under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Apollo Tyres Limited, challenged a show cause notice dated 2 August 2024 issued by the Additional Director, Directorate General of GST...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stay Order in GST Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction — Mandamus Issued to Admit Appeal. Pre-deposit condition under Section 107(6) of CGST/SGST Acts 2017 cannot be imposed by appellate authority without first admitting the appeal.

The petitioner, M/S Tejas Arecanut Traders, a proprietary concern engaged in the business of arecanut trading, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 90(3) of CGST Rules as Ultra Vires in Refund Re-Application Case. Rule 90(3) requiring fresh refund application within two years of relevant date held inconsistent with Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constit...