Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1694 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1694 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Trade Tax Exemption Case Under U.P. Trade Tax Act. Exemption Denied as New Product Not Considered Different in Nature Under Diversification Scheme Under Section 4-A(5) of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from an appeal by a manufacturer against the denial of trade tax exemption under Section 4-A(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice by speed post or courier must be proved by cogent evidence; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of petitions and applications under Section 482 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 90(3) of CGST Rules as Ultra Vires in Refund Re-Application Case. Rule 90(3) requiring fresh refund application within two years of relevant date held inconsistent with Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice After 16-Year Delay Due to Inordinate and Unexplained Lapse of Time. Revenue Cannot Keep Show Cause Notice Pending Indefinitely Without Any Adjudication or Communication to Assessee.

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, quashed a show cause notice issued by the Deputy Commissione...