Bombay High Court Answers Reference on Conflicting Decisions in Customs Import Case — Tribunal's Preference for SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. Upheld. The Court held that the Tribunal correctly followed the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India, which was later confirmed by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court, over Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, M/s Mewati & Co., sought clearance of two consignments of Neutral Malt Spirit (concentrated whiskey) under a REP license. The Customs objected on the ground that the imported goods were not used in the manufacture of the export product for which the license was granted. A show cause notice was issued, and upon adjudication, the import was held unauthorised and the goods were confiscated. The Collector (Appeals) confirmed the confiscation, and the Tribunal also upheld the orders. The Tribunal was faced with two conflicting judgments of the Bombay High Court: Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India (1991) 53 ELT 165 and SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India (1993) 954 ELT 376. The Tribunal preferred to follow SVA Udyog, which had been confirmed by a Division Bench and later affirmed by the Supreme Court. The applicant sought a reference under Section 130D of the Customs Act, 1962, raising two questions: (a) whether Bussa Overseas prevails over SVA Udyog, and (b) whether the Tribunal was correct in preferring SVA Udyog. The High Court answered the reference by holding that the Tribunal was correct in following SVA Udyog, as it was the later judgment and had been upheld by higher courts, making it the binding precedent. The Court did not disturb the Tribunal's decision.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Import License - REP License - Section 130D Customs Act, 1962 - The issue was whether the Tribunal correctly followed the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India (1993) 954 ELT 376 (Bom) instead of Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India (1991) 53 ELT 165 (Bom) regarding clearance of Neutral Malt Spirit under REP license. The Court held that the Tribunal's preference for SVA Udyog was correct as it was later confirmed by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court, making it the binding precedent. (Paras 1-5)

B) Customs Law - Confiscation - Unauthorised Import - REP License - The import of Neutral Malt Spirit (concentrated whiskey) was held unauthorised as the items did not find use in manufacture of the export product for which the license was granted. The Tribunal confirmed the confiscation, and the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was correct in preferring to follow the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India over Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India, and which judgment prevails.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court answered the reference by holding that the Tribunal was correct in following the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India, as it was later confirmed by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court, and thus the Tribunal's preference was proper.

Law Points

  • Precedent
  • Stare decisis
  • Binding nature of judgments
  • Customs Act
  • 1962
  • Section 130D
  • Import license
  • REP license
  • Neutral Malt Spirit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 75

Custom Reference No.1 of 1996

2010-03-12

V.C. Daga, K.K. Tated

Mr. Madhur Baya for applicant, Mr. R.B. Pardeshi for respondent

M/s Mewati & Co.

The Commissioner of Customs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Reference under Section 130D of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking opinion on questions of law arising from Tribunal order.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought clearance of two consignments of Neutral Malt Spirit under REP license and later challenged the confiscation order.

Filing Reason

The import of Neutral Malt Spirit was objected to by Customs as the items did not find use in manufacture of the export product for which the license was granted.

Previous Decisions

The adjudicating authority held the import unauthorised and confiscated the goods. The Collector (Appeals) confirmed the confiscation. The Tribunal also confirmed the orders.

Issues

Whether the judgment in Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India prevails over SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India. Whether the Tribunal was correct in preferring to follow SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India over Bussa Overseas.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that Bussa Overseas was a direct judgment on the issue and should prevail. The respondent argued that SVA Udyog was later confirmed by the Division Bench and Supreme Court, making it binding.

Ratio Decidendi

When there are conflicting judgments of the same High Court, the later judgment that has been confirmed by a Division Bench and the Supreme Court is binding and prevails over an earlier judgment.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a Reference arising out of common order dated 28th July, 1995 made by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate, Tribunal, Mumbai... The Tribunal after threadbare discussion for the reasons recorded, relied upon the judgment of the S.V.Udyog Viniyog Ltd.

Procedural History

The applicant imported two consignments of Neutral Malt Spirit under REP license. Customs objected. Show cause notice issued. Adjudication held import unauthorised and confiscated goods. Appeal to Collector (Appeals) confirmed. Appeal to Tribunal confirmed. Applicant filed reference under Section 130D of Customs Act, 1962 to High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 130D
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Answers Reference on Conflicting Decisions in Customs Import Case — Tribunal's Preference for SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. Upheld. The Court held that the Tribunal correctly followed the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of In...